Developing a Tool to Measure Person-Centered Care in Service Planning

Bibliographic Data

ID15516994
AuthorsVictoria Stanhope (0000-0002-5648-3545, New York University, corresponding author), Daniel Baslock (0000-0003-0092-7300, New York University), Janis Tondora (0000-0003-2997-8136, Yale University), Lauren Jessell (0000-0003-3590-8652, New York University), Abigail M Ro (0000-0003-3706-4166, Fordham University), Abigail M Ross, Steven C Marcu (0000-0001-7819-3824, University of Pennsylvania), Steven C Marcus
Year2021
Volume12
Pages681597-681597
Publication date2021-08-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681597
PMID34408678
OpenAlexW3187716451
LanguageEN
References cited25

Background: Delivering person-centered care is a key component of health care reform. Despite widespread endorsement, medical and behavioral health settings struggle to specify and measure person-centered care objectively. This study presents the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Care Planning Assessment Measure (PCCP-AM), an objective measure of the extent to which service planning is person-centered. Methods: Based upon the recovery-oriented practice of person-centered care planning, the 10-item PCCP-AM tool rates service plans on the inclusion of service user strengths, personal life goals, natural supports, self-directed actions and the promotion of community integration. As part of a large randomized controlled trial of person-centered care planning, service plans completed by community mental health clinic providers were rated using the PCCP-AM. Reliability was tested by calculating inter-rater reliability across 168 plans and internal consistency across 798 plans. To test concurrent validity, PCCP-AM scores for 84 plans were compared to expert rater scores on a separate instrument. Results: Interrater reliability for each of the 10 PCCP-AM items as measured by Kendall's W ranged from W = 0.77 to W = 0.89 and percent of scores within ± 1 point of each other ranged from 85.7 to 100%. Overall internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's alpha across 798 plans was α = 0.72. Concurrent validity as measured by Kendall's W ranged from W = 0.55 to W = 0.74 and percent of item scores within ± 1 point of expert rater scores ranged from 73.8 to 86.8%. Conclusions: Findings demonstrated that the 10-item PCCP-AM was a valid and reliable objective measure of person-centered care. Using the service plan as an indicator of multiple domains of person-centered care, the measure provides a valuable tool to inform clinical supervision and quality improvement across programs. More psychometric testing is needed to strengthen the measure for research purposes

Cronbach's alpha · Health care · Inter-rater reliability · Mental health · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Rating scale · Reliability (semiconductor · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology