A restatement of the protein transition
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15545258 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Océane Duluins (0000-0003-0548-4991, UCLouvain, corresponding author), Renée P M Cardinaals (0000-0001-8951-0645, Wageningen University & Research), Hanna Karlsson (0000-0002-3273-176X, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Sarah Nájera Espinosa (0000-0002-2938-6483, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Kajsa Resare Sahlin (0000-0001-7361-4941, Stockholm Resilience Centre), Jeroen J L Candel (0000-0003-2302-9159, Wageningen University & Research), Sara Hornborg (0000-0003-0814-5258, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden), Alan Matthews (0000-0003-4811-5299), Philippe V Baret (0000-0002-6189-666X, UCLouvain) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 084042-084042 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Research Letters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326 |
| Publisher | IOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ade86f |
| OpenAlex | W4411690529 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 77 |
A protein transition is promoted as a pathway toward a sustainable food system, but its application and progress are potentially hindered by diverse, often conflicting narratives among various stakeholders. These narratives are constituted and underpinned by statements and nurture a growing polarisation by isolation of their underlying scientific evidence. The multidimensional and interdisciplinary nature of a protein transition does not go well with an isolated approach in academia. The latter leads to fragmented and incomplete scientific evidence that fails to fully grasp the complexity of the issue, while being used to form partial statements that feed societal and political debates. Through a Restatement approach, this paper aims to (i) synthesise scientific evidence from multiple academic disciplines related to a protein transition and (ii) critically reflect on the implications of the current fragmented scientific evidence landscape of a protein transition in academia and beyond. The Restatement is structured into three sections: Background, Context, and Impacts, with subsections that each cover 4–17 statements, with a total of 68 statements. We connected each statement to its supporting scientific evidence which revealed the complexity of how evidence is related and interpreted, in addition to the inconsistent use of terminology and resulting ambiguities. The main takeaway from the Restatement is that a protein transition cannot be reduced to a single message of a dietary shift but that it should be approached more holistically, while using the available evidence within the appropriate context and critical consideration of the methodologies used to obtain that evidence. This Restatement can be used by researchers and decision-makers working toward more sustainable food systems in the European Union and beyond, to understand the contexts and methods that are not within their own field of expertise. In addition, we stress that overcoming polarisation in a protein transition largely relies on critical reflections of the assumptions, interests and power dynamics shaping the protein transition debate
Transition (genetics · Chemistry · Enzyme Structure and Function · Microtubule and mitosis dynamics · Protein Structure and Dynamics · Biochemistry
The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss
Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods
The next protein transition
What kind of a science is sustainability science?
Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers
“Stop Blaming the Cows!”
Public policies and vested interests preserve the animal farming status quo at the expense of animal product analogs
The role of seafood in sustainable diets
Impacts of European livestock production
Power & protein—closing the ‘justice gap’ for food system transformation
Climate change and food security in selected Sub-Saharan African Countries
Improving health and carbon footprints of European diets using a benchmarking approach
Protein pluralism and food systems transition
A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability
A review of policy levers to reduce meat production and consumption
Progress towards sustainable agriculture hampered by siloed scientific discourses
Safeguarding Natura 2000 habitats from nitrogen deposition by tackling ammonia emissions from livestock facilities
Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
Palatable disruption
Transitions to sustainability
Meat, money and messaging
Why the Great Food Transformation may not happen – A deep-dive into our food systems’ political economy, controversies and politics of evidence
When food systems meet sustainability – Current narratives and implications for actions
Explaining differences in research utilization in evidence-based government ministries
Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective
Meat politics. Analysing actors, strategies and power relations governing the meat regime in Austria
Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems
What counts as evidence for policy? An analysis of policy actors' perceptions
The Dublin Declaration
Framing the future of food
Imaginary lock-ins in climate change politics
The Geopolitics of Food Security and Food Sovereignty in Latin America
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |