The political economy of expedience
Examining perspectives on military support to Sierra Leone’s Ebola response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15554831 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Santiago Boland (0000-0001-6470-5470, Chatham House, corresponding author), Dina Balabanova (0000-0001-7163-3428, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Susannah H Mayhew (0000-0002-2433-3809, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 53-53 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conflict and Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1752-1505 • E-ISSN: 1752-1505 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13031-023-00553-6 |
| PMID | 37932772 |
| OpenAlex | W4388416469 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 32 |
The 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic is the largest outbreak of Ebola in history. By September, 2014 the outbreak was worsening significantly, and the international president of Médecins Sans Frontières called for military assistance. In Sierra Leone, the British and Sierra Leonean militaries intervened. They quickly established a National Ebola Response Centre and a constituent network of District Ebola Response Centres. Thereafter, these inherently militarised centres are where almost all Ebola response activities were coordinated. In order to examine perspectives on the nature of the militaries' intervention, 110 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted and analysed. Military support to Sierra Leone's Ebola response was felt by most respondents to be a valuable contribution to the overall effort to contain the outbreak, especially in light of the perceived weakness of the Ministry of Health and Sanitation to effectively do so. However, a smaller number of respondents emphasised that the military deployments facilitated various structural harms, including for how the perceived exclusion of public institutions (as above) and other local actors from Ebola response decision making was felt to prevent capacity building, and in turn, to limit resilience to future crises. The concurrent provision of life-saving assistance and rendering of structural harm resulting from the militaries' intervention is ultimately found to be part of a vicious cycle, which this article conceptualises as the 'political economy of expedience', a paradox that should be considered inherent in any militarised intervention during humanitarian and public health crises
Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Health services research · Pathology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public health · Sierra leone · Sociology · Global Security and Public Health · International Development and Aid · Law · Medicine · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Ebola
Global health security
Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research
Unsettled authority and humanitarian practice
Community engagement and vulnerability in infectious diseases
Ebola, Disease-Control, and the Security Council
Towards an understanding of resilience
China’s response to the 2014–2016 Ebola crisis
(Re)arranging “systems of care” in the early Ebola response in Sierra Leone
Global Health Security
Pitfalls of Professionalism? Military Academies and Coup Risk
The (de)Militarization of Humanitarian Aid
The Challenge of Civil-military Relations in International Peace Operations
Citizens, dependents, sons of the soil
Out of War
A Crouching Village
Ebola and Public Authority
Neoliberal health reforms and the failure of healthcare in Sierra Leone
International Political Economy and the 2014 West African Ebola Outbreak
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |