What types of problems are grand challenges
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15735955 |
|---|---|
| Authors | ANITA VÄLIKANGAS (0000-0003-2581-9314, University of Helsinki, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2025.2602316 |
| OpenAlex | W7117778745 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
The notion of grand challenges has featured in research policy for over two decades, specifically in the design of funding for societally significant research topics. This paper analyses the historical background behind this phenomenon, showing how the United States and the European Union have approached it from dissimilar perspectives. Even though many challenge-focused funding programmes emphasise the social benefits of research, they represent wide differences of opinion concerning the inclusion of various forms of academic and non-academic expertise and knowledge, and what would be ideal outcomes. This facilitates the use of challenge-oriented notions in research policy in a manner that aligns with current political and strategic priorities, instead of being tied to more democratic and socially engaged forms of knowledge production. There is a pressing need for co-production and stakeholder engagement to genuinely address social challenges, which in turn calls for research policies that promote social responsibility and democratic principles, thereby fostering responsible research and innovation aligned with societal needs
Democracy · Ideal (ethics · Inclusion (mineral · Politics · Responsible Research and Innovation · Social responsibility · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · International Science and Diplomacy
Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges
Transformative innovation policy
The Limited Role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Interdisciplinary Funding
Normative Paradigms and Interdisciplinary Research
The ethics of wicked problems
Philosophy of Ethnobiology
Transformative innovation policy
What’s wrong with global challenges
Challenge-driven innovation and responsible innovation
Creating relevant knowledge in transdisciplinary research projects - Coping with inherent tensions
The uses of grand challenges in research policy and university management
Responsibility and the hidden politics of directionality
Managing budgetary uncertainty, interpreting policy. How researchers integrate “grand challenges” funding programs into their research agendas
On with critique! The necessity of critique in addressing the political deficits of responsible innovation
Mismatched and misaligned
Limits of decentered governance in science-society policies
A human capability approach to transformative innovation policy. Theoretical insights and practical implications for directionality
Epistemic inclusion
Critique in, for, with, and of responsible innovation
RRI legacies
The politics of co-production
Is it possible to give scientific solutions to Grand Challenges? On the idea of grand challenges for life science research
The politics of scaling
Fixing Technology with Society
Towards a “Hinterland” for Doing Relevance. A Typology of Practices and Competencies to Guide the Development of more Relevant Research and Career Paths
Strategically Unclear? Organising Interdisciplinarity in an Excellence Programme of Interdisciplinary Research in Denmark
Science and trans-science
Measurement requires compromises
The Societal Territory of Academic Disciplines
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice
Technically speaking
The rise of big philanthropy in global social policy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |