Policymakers’ perspective on the importance of procedural fairness to implement and sustain health financing reforms
Bibliographic Data
Fair process is instrumental to implementing and sustaining health financing reforms. Ensuring a fair process during the design and adoption phases can garner political capital and secure a sense of citizens’ ownership. This will prove useful when reforms are contested before benefits are yet to be fully materialized. Since many well devised health financing reforms are vulnerable to being dismantled after a few years of being launched, fair process should play a more strategic role in the implementation and evaluation phases when policies get challenged and reformulated to reflect the changing political and socioeconomic landscapes and to better manage early evidence on performance
Business · Capital (architecture) · Economics · Perspective (graphical) · Political capital · Political science · Politics · Population · Process (computing) · Public economics · Socioeconomic status · Finance · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine
Beyond fragmentation and towards universal coverage
Difficult trade-offs in response to Covid-19
Developing the improved Community Health Fund in Tanzania
Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions
Procedural fairness and the resilience of health financing reforms in Ukraine
Why did Ghana’s national health insurance capitation payment model fall off the policy agenda? A regional level policy analysis
Regulating More Effectively
Limits to Health Care
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |