Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When is sex-specific research appropriate

Bibliographic Data

ID17814204
AuthorsWilliam Rogers (0000-0001-9186-870X, corresponding author), Angela Ballantyne (0000-0003-2666-9557)
Year2008
Volume1
Issue2
Pages36-57
Publication date2008-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1937-4577 • E-ISSN: 1937-4585
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/ijfab.1.2.36
OpenAlexW138054029
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited3

Inclusion in research is a question of both scientific validity of research results and just distribution of the benefits of medical research within a community. Therefore, inappropriate exclusions from research can be regulated as a matter of science or a matter of ethics. In this paper we examine the definitions of appropriate/ fair inclusion in the Australian and U.S. regulatory systems and discuss the processes for interpreting and implementing these normative standards. In the second part of the paper, we present original results from the first study of sex-specific research in Australia. One hundred and thirteen published papers were examined: 35 percent were classified as inappropriate sex-specific research, where exclusion was not biologically necessary, and/or there was no justification for the exclusion of one sex. Our results indicate that a scientific approach to inclusion, rather than one grounded in ethical review, is likely to be more effective in achieving appropriate sex-specific research. In the absence of effective regulation, we will continue to see research that discriminates unfairly and perpetuates gender stereotyping

Alternative medicine · Inclusion and exclusion criteria · Inclusion–exclusion principle · Medical research · Normative · Political science · Politics · Research ethics · Social science · Sociological research · Sociology · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Sex and Gender in Healthcare · Social Psychology

  • The Paradox of Patient Consent

    Kristen L Cole•Health Communication•2021

  • Inclusion and exclusion in women's access to health and medicine

    Suzanne Dodd•International Journal of Feminist…•2008

  • Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials

    Vivek H Murthy, Harlan M Krumholz et al.•JAMA•2004

  • Inclusion and exclusion in women's access to health and medicine

    Suzanne Dodd•International Journal of Feminist…•2008

  • Feminism meets the "new" epidemiologies

    Open Access•M C Inhorn, K Lisa Whittle•Social Science & Medicine•2001

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,11
Citation span2008 - 2021 (14)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae