Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peer Debriefing

Bibliographic Data

ID18940407
AuthorsValerie J Janesick (corresponding author)
Year2007
Publication date2007-02-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeOTHER
VenueThe Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (JOURNAL)
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp014
OpenAlexW4239743155
ISBN9781405165518
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited3

Peer debriefing is a technique used by qualitative researchers for multiple reasons. Good qualitative researchers plan ahead when designing a study to include peer debriefing or a variation of it. Peer debriefing allows a peer to review and assess transcripts, emerging categories from those transcripts, and the final report. In addition, a peer acts as a sort of critical detective or auditor. This peer may detect whether or not a researcher has over‐emphasized a point, or missed a rival legitimate hypothesis, under‐emphasized a point, and in general does a careful reading of the data and the final report. Many writers have suggested that peer debriefing enhances the trustworthiness and credibility of a qualitative research project (Lincoln & Guba 1985; Creswell 1998; Spall 1998; Spillett 2003; Janesick 2004). Included in the peer review of information might be the full data set such as observations, transcripts, documents, photographs, and videotaped interviews

Credibility · Debriefing · Peer review · Political science · Qualitative research · Sociology · Computer Science · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Psychology

  • Institutional Support and Black Women Resident Assistants across Environments

    Ericka Roland•Journal of Student Affairs…•2021

  • Spaces of Unmoderated Hate? The Legitimization of Anti-Immigration Narratives on Right-Wing Alternative Media

    Open Access•Michael Hameleers•Digital Journalism•2026

  • Subjective Understandings of Positive Interactions among Strangers during Neighbourhood Walks

    Open Access•Sina Kuzuoglu, Troy D Glover et al.•International Journal of the…•2026

  • Revising Diabetes Programming for Black Men and Their Families

    Open Access•Tera R Hurt, Tera R Jordan et al.•Global Qualitative Nursing Research•2020

  • Elementary Classroom Teachers’ Self-Reported Use of Movement Integration Products and Perceived Facilitators and Barriers Related to Product Use

    Open Access•Roddrick Dugger, Aaron Rafferty et al.•Children•2020

  • Family-Centered Care in the Transition to Early Hearing Intervention

    Open Access•Mansoureh Nickbakht, Carly Meyer et al.•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2021

  • The ‘thin’ and ‘thick’ needs of Roma

    Open Access•Patricia Kennedy, Siobhan Curran et al.•European Societies•2018

  • It is just a lever for success in life’

    Devora Hellerstein, Yeshayahu Hutzler•Sport Education and Society•2025

  • How I Make It Through

    Open Access•Stephen Vinson, Stephen Michael Vinson•Youth & Society•2026

  • It's that camaraderie

    Open Access•Amy Somerton, Holly Jeffrey•Journal of Health Psychology•2025

  • Mediating between schools and families

    Open Access•Yao Wang, Sara Ganassin•Educational Review•2025

  • “Stretching” Exercises for Qualitative Researchers

    Valerie J Janesick•“Stretching” Exercises for…•2016

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • Peer Debriefing in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Sharon Spall•Qualitative Inquiry•1998

Unique citing works11
Citations per year1,38
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae