Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Patient-Centered Communication Preferences in AI-Powered Mental Health Chatbots

Evidence from Two Preregistered Studies

Bibliographic Data

ID19235707
AuthorsKatharina Angermayr (0009-0003-5816-426X, University of Augsburg, corresponding author), Nathalie Laura Neuendorf (0000-0002-5938-8578, University of Augsburg), Sebastian Scherr (0000-0003-4730-1575, University of Augsburg)
Year2026
Pages1-16
Publication date2026-06-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Communication (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1041-0236 • E-ISSN: 1532-7027
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10410236.2026.2666885
PMID42290401
OpenAlexW7164847817
LanguageEN
References cited105

Access to mental health information is shifting from static search to conversational AI. Guided by patient-centered communication (PCC), two preregistered U.S. studies identified preferred communication features for interactions with AI chatbots about mental health and how individuals trade them off within feature bundles. Study 1 (N = 414, US quota sample) used a Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) to identify the six most relevant PCC-aligned features for healthcare providers. Study 2 analyzed an AI chatbot subsample (n = 268) drawn from a U.S. quota-representative sample in a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) to quantify trade-offs between combinations of these preferred features. Across both studies, users strongly wanted two communication features simultaneously in AI mental-health chatbots: reflective listening and multi-symptom assessment. Importantly, relational and clinical PCC-aligned features are most highly valued in interactions with AI mental-health chatbots. These preferences remained largely consistent across users and their preferences for communication accommodation

Active listening · Chatbot · Health communication · Information seeking · Mental health · Self-disclosure · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Digital Mental Health Interventions

  • Applied Choice Analysis

    Open Access•David A Hensher, Jessica M Rose et al.•Applied Choice Analysis•2015

  • Best-Worst Scaling

    Open Access•Jordan J Louviere, Terry N Flynn et al.•Best-Worst Scaling•2015

  • Capturing Causal Complexity

    Santi Furnari, Donal Crilly et al.•Academy of Management Review•2021

  • Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum

    John W Ayers, Adam Poliak et al.•JAMA Internal Medicine•2023

  • An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being

    Open Access•Becky Inkster, Shubhankar Sarda et al.•JMIR mHealth and uHealth•2018

  • Conversational agents in healthcare

    Open Access•Liliana Laranjo, Adam G Dunn et al.•Journal of the American Medical…•2018

  • ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice

    Open Access•Malik Sallam•Healthcare•2023

  • How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity

    Open Access•Matthew Quaife, Fern Terris-Prestholt et al.•The European Journal of Health…•2018

  • Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot)

    Open Access•Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy et al.•JMIR Mental Health•2017

  • The alliance in adult psychotherapy

    Open Access•Christoph Flückiger, A C Del Re et al.•Psychotherapy•2018

  • Improving the Spiritual Dimension of Whole Person Care

    Open Access•Christina M Puchalski, Robert J Vitillo et al.•Journal of Palliative Medicine•2014

  • Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering

    Ronald M Epstein, Richard L Street•PsycEXTRA Dataset•2007

  • Toward a Theory of Interactive Media Effects (Time)

    Open Access•Sundar, S Shyam Sundar et al.•The Handbook of the Psychology of…•2015

  • The effects of human-like social cues on social responses towards text-based conversational agents—a meta-analysis

    Open Access•Stefanie Helene Klein•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Effects of social skills on lexical alignment in human-human interaction and human-computer interaction

    Open Access•Huiyang Shen, Min Wang•Computers in Human Behavior•2023

  • User preferences and trust in hypothetical analog, digitalized and AI-based medical consultation scenarios

    Open Access•Carlotta J Mayer, Julia Mahal et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • Explaining the use of AI chatbots as context alignment

    Open Access•Sebastian Scherr, Bolin Cao et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2025

  • Patients' valuation of the prescribing nurse in primary care

    Open Access•Karen Gerard, Michela Tinelli et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • Users’ Intention to Continue Using Online Mental Health Communities

    Open Access•Jingfang Liu, Jiayu Wang•International Journal of…•2021

  • Brief Commentary

    Open Access•Felipe M Affonso, Jacob Goldenberg et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2026

  • Machines and Mindlessness

    Open Access•Clifford, Clifford Nass et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2000

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae