Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Native- and nonnative-speaking EFL teachers’ evaluation of Chinese students’ English writing

Bibliographic Data

ID19380796
AuthorsLing Shi (0000-0002-5831-813X, University of British Columbia, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume18
Issue3
Pages303-325
Publication date2001-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage Testing (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-5322 • E-ISSN: 1477-0946
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/026553220101800303
OpenAlexW2136852860
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited21

This study examined differences between native and nonnative EFL (English as a Foreign Language) teachers’ ratings of the English writing of Chinese university students. I explored whether two groups of teachers -expatriates who typically speak English as their first language and ethnic Chinese with proficiency in English -gave similar scores to the same writing task and used the same criteria in their judgements. Forty-six teachers -23 Chinese and 23 English-background -rated 10 expository essays using a 10-point scale, then wrote and ranked three reasons for their ratings. I coded their reported reasons as positive or negative criteria under five major categories: general, content, organization, language and length. MANOVA showed no significant differences between the two groups in their scores for the 10 essays. Chi-square tests, however, showed that the English-background teachers attended more positively in their criteria to the content and language, whereas the Chinese teachers attended more negatively to the organization and length of the essays. The Chinese teachers were also more concerned with content and organization in their first criteria, whereas English-background teachers focused more on language in their third criteria. The results raise questions about the validity of holistic ratings as well as the underlying differences between native and nonnative EFL teachers in their instructional goals for second language (L2) writing

English as a foreign language · First language · Foreign language · Language assessment · Language proficiency · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Multivariate analysis of variance · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • A Study of the EFL Writing of Chinese Learners

    Bin Ai•Changing English•2015

  • What influences the comprehensibility of L2 writers' opinion texts by L2 readers? Interactions between textual characteristics and readers’ profiles

    Open Access•Miyuki Sasaki, Yui Suzukida et al.•System•2024

  • Beyond Differences

    Open Access•Xiaopeng Zhang, Xiaofei Lu et al.•Applied Linguistics•2022

  • Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples

    Liang Guo, Scott A Crossley et al.•Assessing Writing•2013

  • Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement and Bias Patterns in EFL Writing Performance Assessment

    Open Access•Tung-Hsien He, Wen Johnny Gou et al.•Psychological Reports•2013

  • Using a logic model to evaluate rater training for EAP writing assessment

    Open Access•Jeanne O'Connell, J G O'Connell•Journal of English for Academic…•2022

  • Rater variation in pragmatic assessment

    Sunni L Sonnenburg-Winkler, Zohreh R Eslami et al.•Lodz Papers in Pragmatics•2020

  • Task complexity and L2 writing performance of young learners

    Open Access•Chengchen Li, Li Wei et al.•Modern Language Journal•2024

  • N -gram use in EFL learners’ retelling and monologic tasks

    Xiaopeng Zhang, Baoshan Zhao et al.•IRAL - International Review of…•2023

  • Mainstream Teacher Candidates' Perspectives on ESL Writing

    Open Access•Hyun-Sook Kang, Hyun‐sook Kang et al.•TESOL Quarterly•2017

  • Judgments of oral proficiency by non-native and native English speaking teacher raters

    Open Access•Ying Zhang, Ying Zhang Ying Zhang et al.•Language Testing•2011

  • The influence of rater language background on writing performance assessment

    Open Access•Jeff S Johnson, Gad S Lim•Language Testing•2009

  • Students' voices in the evaluation of their written summaries

    Open Access•Guoxing Yu, Guoxing Yu Guoxing Yu•Language Testing•2007

  • Do experience and text quality matter for raters’ decision-making behaviors

    Open Access•Özgür Şahan, Salim Razı•Language Testing•2020

  • The development and maintenance of rating quality in performance writing assessment

    Open Access•Gad S Lim•Language Testing•2011

  • Topical knowledge and ESL writing

    Open Access•Ling He, Ling Shi•Language Testing•2012

  • An examination of rater performance on a local oral English proficiency test

    Open Access•Xun Yan•Language Testing•2014

  • The Impact of Computers on Marking Behaviors and Assessment

    Open Access•Tung‐hsien He•SAGE Open•2019

  • Do ESL Essay Raters' Evaluation Criteria Change With Experience? A Mixed‐Methods, Cross‐Sectional Study

    Open Access•Khaled Barkaoui•TESOL Quarterly•2010

  • Non-native educators in English language teaching

    George Braine•Non-native educators in English…•1999

  • Expertise in evaluating second language compositions

    Open Access•Alister Cumming•Language Testing•1990

  • Examining washback

    Open Access•Dianne Wall, J Charles Alderson•Language Testing•1993

  • Native and Nonnative Reactions to ESL Compositions

    Toshihiko Kobayashi•TESOL Quarterly•1992

  • Do English and ESL Faculties Rate Writing Samples Differently

    James Dean Brown•TESOL Quarterly•1991

  • On the Ethical Treatment of ESL Writers

    T J Silva, Tony Silva•TESOL Quarterly•1997

  • Looking behind the Curtain

    Jeff Connor‐linton, Jeff Connor-Linton•TESOL Quarterly•1995

  • Professors' Reactions to the Academic Writing of Nonnative-Speaking Students

    Terry Santos•TESOL Quarterly•1988

  • On the Power and Status of Nonnative ESL Teachers

    Cecilia Tang•TESOL Quarterly•1997

  • Academic Writing and Chinese Students

    Bernard A Mohan, Bernard Mohan et al.•TESOL Quarterly•1985

  • Rating Nonnative Writing

    Liz Hamp-Lyons, LIZ HAMP‐LYONS•TESOL Quarterly•1995

  • Native and Nonnative Speakers' Pragmatic Interpretations of English Texts

    Eli Hinkel•TESOL Quarterly•1994

  • Communicative Error Evaluation

    Aziz Khalil•TESOL Quarterly•1985

  • Factors Affecting Composition Evaluation in an EFL Context

    Open Access•Hiroe Kobayashi, Carol Rinnert•Language Learning•1996

  • Crosscultural comparison of writing standards

    Open Access•Jeff Connor‐linton•World Englishes•1995

  • Double Standards

    Open Access•Barbara Seidlhofer•World Englishes•1999

Unique citing works19
Citations per year1
Citation span2007 - 2024 (18)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae