Instrumental Approach to Institutional Corruption
Explaining Performance‐Conditional Acceptance of Corruption Among Citizens in European Countries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19480248 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shlomo Mizrahi (0000-0001-6531-6557, corresponding author), Shani Bar |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Regulation & Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-5983 • E-ISSN: 1748-5991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/rego.70175 |
| OpenAlex | W7164506776 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
This article explores the mechanisms through which institutional corruption and engagement in corruption at the societal level may be normalized to the extent that citizens adopt an instrumental approach to corruption. Such an approach means that the public accepts corrupt practices and sees them as reasonable, as long as they achieve results that they see as beneficial. We develop a theoretical framework that includes institutional and behavioral independent variables. We then test our research model using survey data collected from citizens of 27 European countries from Transparency International's Global Corruption Barometer. The findings indicate that the mechanism through which citizens form their perceptions of institutional corruption as instrumental is complex. The normalization of corruption in society does not lead people to rule out process considerations, but it does weaken them among certain segments of the population. Thus, considerations about the outcomes of corrupt activities and the fairness of processes coexist
Accountability · European Social Survey · Instrumental variable · Language change · Perception · Survey data collection · Corruption and Economic Development · E-Government and Public Services · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Stealth Democracy
Violence and Social Orders
Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R 2 GLMM to random slopes models
Managing Legitimacy
Corruption tolerance as a process of moral, social, and political cognition
Does Legitimacy Mitigate Corruption? The Relevance of Social Traps in Low-corruption Contexts
Why cynics disengage
Cynics All Around? The Impact of Election News on Political Cynicism in Comparative Perspective
Political corruption the internal enemy of public institutions
Controlling Corruption
Why Quality Matters
Social Traps and the Problem of Trust
World Development Report 2015
Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law
The Quest for Good Governance
Ethics and Corruption in the European Union
In Honest Officials We Trust
Legal corruption
Regional Governance Matters
Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations
Economic Analysis of Corruption
Institutional Trust, Education, and Corruption
What We (Don't) Know so Far About Tolerance Towards Corruption in European Democracies
Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error
Controlling Corruption Through Collective Action
Who Will Be the “Principled‐Principals”? Perceptions of Corruption and Willingness to Engage in Anticorruption Activism
Theories of Institutional Corruption
Low-Level Corruption Tolerance
Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance
Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities
Why Do Developing Countries Tax So Little
Political Emotions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |