The digital city and the struggle for urban public spaces
A pragmatic rethinking of public space and digital rights in a postliberal urban future
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19491413 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ehsan Dorostkar (0000-0003-2090-7059, University of Tehran, corresponding author), Mahsa Najarsadeghi (0000-0001-5185-2914) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 255-264 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2664-3286 • E-ISSN: 2667-3800 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ugj.2026.05.004 |
| OpenAlex | W7164205373 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 32 |
As digital technologies are increasingly integrated into urban infrastructures, the concept of public space is being transformed. The present paper addresses the relationship between the digital city and urban commons and how digitalization reinforces and subverts the public space paradigm in the post-neoliberal city. While digital technologies promise greater efficiency, connectivity, and civic participation, they also exacerbate social inequalities, facilitate new forms of surveillance and exclusion, and privatize public space. In light of neoliberalism theory, urban commons, and digital rights, this paper critically reflects on how cities are reconfiguring public spaces in the age of smart cities and data-driven government. Drawing on analyses of urban alternative practices and grassroots resistance, the article explores the potential for recapturing the urban commons through collective action to reassert citizens' Right to the city. The study finds new digital movements that challenge the hegemony of corporate-led urban policy and offers a lens for thinking about the future of cities through a balance of technological advancement and social justice. Lastly, this article requires reimagining city government that ensures the digital city is a place of participatory democracy, inclusiveness, and fairness in the face of neoliberal demands
Digital Rights · Public policy · Public space · Space (punctuation) · Urban planning · Urban space · Smart Cities and Technologies · Social Media and Politics · Urban Planning and Governance
Internet of Things for Smart Cities
Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance
Command and control governance in the 100 smart cities mission in India
Assessing data governance models for smart cities
The New Urban Agenda
SDG-11 and smart cities
Policing the smart city
Don’t call me resilient again!’
The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism
Smart cities
The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore
Smart cities, virtual futures? – Interests of urban actors in mediating digital technology and urban space in Tallinn, Estonia
Provincialising smart urbanism in Taipei
Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation
Smart city technologies for sustainable urban planning
Transforming urban neighborhoods from ‘bed towns’ to eco-friendly smart cities in Korea
Leveraging NFTs for sustainable urban finance
Public views of the smart city
The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
Automated landlord
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |