Are religious people nicer people? Taking a closer look at the religion–empathy relationship

Bibliographic Data

ID19503878
AuthorsBart Duriez (KU Leuven, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume7
Issue3
Pages249-254
Publication date2004-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMental Health Religion & Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1367-4676 • E-ISSN: 1469-9737
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13674670310001606450
OpenAlexW2137755423
LanguageEN
Citations received43
References cited29

It has been argued that an empathically mediated, kin-specific, altruistic impulse is part of the human genetic heritage, and that one of the functions of religion is to extend the range of this impulse beyond the kinship circle. However, it is clear that religion does not always succeed in this. The present study reconsiders the religiosity–empathy relation in a Flemish student sample (n = 375), using the Post-Critical Belief Scale, which allows to distinguish between being religious or not (Exclusion versus Inclusion of Transcendence) from the way in which religious contents are processed (Literal versus Symbolic). It is argued that the religiosity–empathy relation should be understood in terms of how people process religious contents rather than in terms of whether or not people are religious. In line with this reasoning, results show that, whereas empathy is unrelated to being religious, it is positively related to processing religious contents in a symbolic way. Social desirability did not influence these relationships

Empathy · Epistemology · Faith · Kinship · Religiosity · Religious belief · Religious identity · Secularity · Sociology · Anthropology · Cultural Differences and Values · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Religious studies · Social Psychology