Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer
How might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19508441 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephanie Sivell (0000-0003-0253-1860, Cardiff University), Adrian Edwards (0000-0001-7432-2828, IS practice), Glyn Elwyn (0000-0002-0917-6286, Cardiff University), Antony Manstead (0000-0001-7540-2096, Cardiff University), Antony S R Manstead |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | s1 |
| Pages | 6-19 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00558.x |
| PMID | 20579123 |
| OpenAlex | W2101239203 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 80 |
Objective To describe the evidence about factors influencing breast cancer patients’ surgery choices and the implications for designing decision support in reference to an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Common Sense Model of Illness Representations (CSM). Background A wide range of factors are known to influence the surgery choices of women diagnosed with early breast cancer facing the choice of mastectomy or breast conservation surgery with radiotherapy. However, research does not always reflect the complexities of decision making and is often atheoretical. A theoretical approach, as provided by the CSM and the TPB, could help to identify and tailor support by focusing on patients’ representations of their breast cancer and predicting surgery choices. Design Literature search and narrative synthesis of data. Synthesis Twenty‐six studies reported women’s surgery choices to be influenced by perceived clinical outcomes of surgery, appearance and body image, treatment concerns, involvement in decision making and preferences of clinicians. These factors can be mapped onto the key constructs of both the TPB and CSM and used to inform the design and development of decision support interventions to ensure accurate information is provided in areas most important to patients. Conclusions The TPB and CSM have the potential to inform the design of decision support for breast cancer patients, with accurate and clear information that avoids leading patients to make decisions they may come to regret. Further research is needed examining how the components of the extended TPB and CSM account for patients’ surgery choices
Breast cancer · Cancer · Mastectomy · Psychological intervention · Regret · Theory of planned behavior · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Cancer survivorship and care · Computer Science · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology
Some problems with social cognition models
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Acting on intentions
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations
The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)
A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0
Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making.
From Intentions to Actions
The theory of planned behavior
Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1
Decision Making--A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment
Building on the best – choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS
Concern About Aspects of Body Image and Adjustment to Early Stage Breast Cancer
Discussion of Treatment Options for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Some Tests of the Distinction between Cognitive and Affective Beliefs
The theory of decision making
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2019 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |