Brief Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Screening Tools
A Scoping Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19521960 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maxine Davis (0000-0003-1653-4464, The University of Texas at Arlington, corresponding author), Diana Padilla-Medina (0000-0003-1958-4969, The University of Texas at Arlington) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 900-913 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Trauma Violence & Abuse (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1524-8380 • E-ISSN: 1552-8324 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1524838019888545 |
| PMID | 31771463 |
| OpenAlex | W2989672439 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 52 |
Recent research findings indicate that patients are willing to disclose their use of violence to health-care providers if asked. Health-care providers have a unique opportunity to screen their patients for intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration; however, given the time constraints and limited personnel within medical offices and emergency-care facilities, instrument brevity is critically important. The development and evaluation of tools to screen for IPV perpetration in health-care settings, particularly brief instruments, is limited by the lack of adequate guidelines, clear institutional policies for screening, and reviews of the available literature. Given the need for validated measurement tools, we assessed the psychometric properties of measurement tools designed to quickly detect IPV perpetration by conducting a scoping review. Our search identified five measures meeting eligibility requirements. Inclusion criteria required that study information be published in a peer-reviewed journal, be published in English or Spanish languages, contain 10 or less items, report psychometric testing results, require no additional information, and be designed to detect IPV perpetration. We searched subject-specific databases and the bibliographies of relevant publications to identify studies. As part of appraising and synthesizing the evidence, we found most measures to have good reliability and validity. Most measures contained 2–5 items. Most studies were conducted in the United States and utilized an adequate sample size. There were considerable differences in how each of the measures determined a positive or negative screening. Gaps in the literature and areas for future research pertained to sample diversity, invariance testing, and practice guidelines for implementation
Computer security · Domestic violence · Injury prevention · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Suicide prevention · Computer Science · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
The effects of adverse childhood experiences on deaf adults
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on intimate partner violence and mental health
Relationship Health and Intimate Partner Violence in Integrated Primary Care
What Matters in Help-Seeking and Disclosure Intent of Intimate Partner Violence During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Un-siloing securitization
Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Responding to Intimate Partner Violence Use Disclosures in U.S. Healthcare Settings
Strategies for Identification of Intimate Partner Violence in Healthcare Settings
Promise and pitfalls
How Health Professionals Identify and Respond to Perpetrators of Domestic and Family Violence in a Hospital Setting
Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire for Victimization and Perpetration (DVQ-VP) in Ecuadorian population
Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization from Adolescence to Young Adulthood in a Nationally Representative Sample
Trust in the health care professional and health outcome
A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs
Patients’ trust in physicians
Intimate Partner Violence and Adverse Health Consequences
Measuring Patients’ Trust In Physicians When Assessing Quality Of Care
Physical Health Consequences of Physical and Psychological Intimate Partner Violence
Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tools
Intimate Partner Violence, PTSD, and Adverse Health Outcomes
Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts
Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
A typology of reviews
Does Batterer Treatment Reduce Violence
Female Perpetration of Violence in Heterosexual Intimate Relationships
Compared to What? A Meta-Analysis of Batterer Intervention Studies Using Nontreated Controls or Comparisons
Women’s Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Accuracy and Acceptability of a Screening Tool for Identifying Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration among Women Veterans
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners
Development and psychometric evaluation of a rapid intimate partner violence perpetration screening tool
Domestic Violence
Scoping studies
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |