Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A qualitative appraisal of stakeholder reactions to a tool for burden of disease–based health system budgeting in Ghana

Bibliographic Data

ID19530833
AuthorsJohn Koku Awoonor‐Williams (0000-0002-1094-8212, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, corresponding author), Margaret L Schmitt (0000-0002-1860-2929, Department of Public Health), Janet Awopole Yepakeh Tiah (Ghana Health Service), Janet Tiah (Regional Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service PMB), Joyce Aputere Ndago (0009-0006-9221-1367, Ghana Health Service), Joyce Ndago (Regional Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service PMB), Rofina Asuru (0000-0001-6112-6027, Ghana Health Service), Ayaga A Bawah (0000-0003-4864-4182, Department of Public Health), Jonathan F Phillips (0000-0002-6720-7204, Department of Public Health)
Year2016
Volume9
Issue1
Pages30448-30448
Publication date2016-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Health Action (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1654-9716 • E-ISSN: 1654-9880
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3402/gha.v9.30448
PMID27246868
OpenAlexW2399505754
LanguageEN
References cited20

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Ghana Health Service launched a program of cooperation with the Tanzania Ministry of Health and Social Welfare that was designed to adapt Tanzania's PLANREP budgeting and reporting tool to Ghana's primary health care program. The product of this collaboration is a system of budgeting, data visualization, and reporting that is known as the District Health Planning and Reporting Tool (DiHPART). OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the design and implementation processes (technical, procedures, feedback, maintenance, and monitoring) of the DiHPART tool in northern Ghana. DESIGN: This paper reports on a qualitative appraisal of user reactions to the DiHPART system and implications of pilot experience for national scale-up. A total of 20 health officials responsible for financial planning operations were drawn from the national, regional, and district levels of the health system and interviewed in open-ended discussions about their reactions to DiHPART and suggestions for systems development. RESULTS: The findings show that technical shortcomings merit correction before scale-up can proceed. The review makes note of features of the software system that could be developed, based on experience gained from the pilot. Changes in the national system of financial reporting and budgeting complicate DiHPART utilization. This attests to the importance of pursuing a software application framework that anticipates the need for automated software generation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenges encountered in the pilot, the results lend support to the notion that evidence-based budgeting merits development and implementation in Ghana

Business · Data collection · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Sociology · Stakeholder · Tanzania · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine

  • A Single Index of Mortality and Morbidity

    Daniel F Sullivan•HSMHA Health Reports•1971

  • Human resources for health

    Open Access•Lincoln Chen, Timothy Evans et al.•The Lancet•2004

  • The qualitative content analysis process

    Open Access•Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2008

  • Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making

    Open Access•Lydia Kapiriri, Ole F Norheim et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2009

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae