Health workers’ perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn health care around the time of childbirth
Results of the Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the Euro Region (IMAgiNE Euro) project in 12 countries of the World Health Organization European Region
Bibliographic Data
Background: Health workers' (HWs') perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) are not routinely collected. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to document HWs' perspectives on QMNC around childbirth in 12 World Health Organization (WHO) European countries. Methods: HWs involved in maternal/neonatal care for at least one year between March 2020 and March 2023 answered an online validated WHO standards-based questionnaire collecting 40 quality measures for improving QMNC. A QMNC index (score 0-400) was calculated as a synthetic measure. Results: Data from 4143 respondents were analysed. For 39 out of 40 quality measures, at least 20% of HWs reported a 'need for improvement', with large variations across countries. Effective training on healthy women/newborns management (n = 2748, 66.3%), availability of informed consent job aids (n = 2770, 66.9%), and effective training on women/newborns rights (n = 2714, 65.5%) presented the highest proportion of HWs stating 'need for improvement'. Overall, 64.8% (n = 2684) of respondents declared that HWs' numbers were insufficient for appropriate care (66.3% in Portugal and 86.6% in Poland), and 22.4% described staff censorship (16.3% in Germany and 56.7% in Poland). The reported QMNC index was low in all countries (Poland median (MD) = 210.60, interquartile range (IQR) = 155.71, 273.57; Norway MD = 277.86; IQR = 244.32, 308.30). The 'experience of care' domain presented in eight countries had significantly lower scores than the other domains (P 0.05). Multivariate analyses confirmed large QMNC variation by country. HWs with <10 years of experience, HWs from public facilities, and midwives rated QMNC with significantly lower scores (P < 0.001). Conclusions: HWs from 12 European countries reported significant gaps in QMNC, lacking association with COVID-19 pandemic trends. Routine monitoring of QMNC and tailored actions are needed to improve health services for the benefit of both users and providers. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04847336
Childbirth · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Health services · Maternal health · Obstetrics · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Medicine · Nursing
The prevention and handling of the missing data
Increasing community health worker productivity and effectiveness
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures
Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon
How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries
Digital Inequality During a Pandemic
The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care
Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era
A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials
The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland
The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement
Voices from the frontline
The global health workforce stock and distribution in 2020 and 2030
Interventions promoting employee “speaking-up” within healthcare workplaces
Use of a participatory quality assessment and improvement tool for maternal and neonatal hospital care. Part 2
Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients
Viés de desejabilidade social na pesquisa qualitativa em saúde
Hospital Childbirth
Providers and women’s perspectives on person-centered maternity care
Methods of coping with social desirability bias
Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data
Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |