The Importance of Community-Based and Community-Partnered Covid-19 Testing for Reducing Disparities Among African American Populations
Bibliographic Data
Background: Health inequalities in African American communities have been further exacerbated by COVID-19. Public health departments and other safety-net providers across the United States have partnered with community-based organizations to address barriers to COVID-19 testing in disproportionately impacted communities. This narrative review summarizes lessons learned from published examples of these community-based COVID-19 testing efforts. Methods: We searched online databases for peer-reviewed articles on community-based COVID-19 testing interventions in the United States aimed at increasing COVID-19 testing among African American populations. We abstracted information about each example and synthesized the primary lessons learned and key aspects that contributed to their success. Results: Seven examples of community-based COVID-19 testing aimed at increasing testing among African Americans and other underserved populations were identified and described, across various U.S. locations and involving multiple types of partners (1) St. Paul, MN (faith, health centers, Mayo Clinic); (2) Chicago, IL (university hospital and health centers); (3) NC (health centers, Community Advisory Board); (4) Baltimore, MD (hospitals, community clinic, mobile clinic); (5) Marion County, FL (health department and community partners); (6) New Orleans, LA (health department and health system); and (7) New York City, NY health and hospital system, mobile clinic). Discussion: Several key aspects of the COVID-19 testing models included the following: (1) close proximity of the testing site to affected communities and availability of walk-up and drive-through testing options; (2) partnerships between safety-net providers and broad community networks, which facilitated outreach and trust; (3) increased resources for safety-net providers; and (4) the use of data to identify areas of need and track impact. The merging of resources and relationships among well-equipped, safety-net providers and other health care institutions and culture-rich, community-centered organizations, to jointly address structural and systemic inequities, is key to cultivating health equity in the distribution of COVID-19 testing and other essential public health services
Community health · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health equity · Outreach · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public health · Safety net · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Medicine · Nursing · SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing · Gerontology
Structural Racism In Historical And Modern US Health Care Policy
Structural racism and health inequities in the USA
Moving beyond mistrust
The Uneven Distribution of Medically Underserved Areas in Chicago
The Perfect Storm
Racial Bias Correlates with States Having Fewer Health Professional Shortage Areas and Fewer Federally Qualified Community Health Center Sites
Is Covid-19 community level testing effective in reaching at-risk populations? Evidence from spatial analysis of New Orleans patient data at walk-up sites
Effects of a Pilot Church-Based Intervention to Reduce HIV Stigma and Promote HIV Testing Among African Americans and Latinos
Feasibility and Outcomes of an HIV Testing Intervention in African American Churches
Strategies That Promote Equity in Covid-19 Vaccine Uptake for Black Communities
Essential and undervalued
Confronting Covid-19 in under-resourced, African American neighborhoods
Street Medicine”
Establishing a Sars-CoV-2 (Covid-19) Drive-Through Collection Site
Medicaid Expansion and Change in Federally Qualified Health Center Accessibility From 2008 to 2016
Medical Mistrust, Racism, and Delays in Preventive Health Screening Among African-American Men
African American experiences in healthcare
Supporting Health Equity Through Data-Driven Decision-Making
Disparities and distrust
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |