The role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in the Covid-19 response across the Global South

A multinational, qualitative study

Bibliographic Data

ID19592668
AuthorsAdam C Levine (0000-0003-3982-3824, Brown University, corresponding author), Anna Park (0000-0003-4203-923X, Brown University, corresponding author), Anindita Adhikari (Brown University, corresponding author), Maria Carinnes P Alejandria (0000-0001-5867-4970, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, corresponding author), B H Bradlow (0000-0003-3121-2068, Princeton University, corresponding author), Maria F Lopez-Portillo (Brown University, corresponding author), Salma Mutwafy (0000-0003-4700-9603, Brown University, corresponding author), Ieva Zumbyte (0000-0002-5314-7642, Brown University, corresponding author), Patrick Heller (0000-0001-6548-0576, Brown University, corresponding author)
EditorsNafis Faizi (0000-0002-4634-6790)
Year2023
Volume3
Issue9
Pagese0002341
Publication date2023-09-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0002341
PMID37708149
OpenAlexW4386738530
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited24

Despite receiving less attention than high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experienced more than 85% of global excess deaths during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the unprecedented speed and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, which placed large demands on government capacity, many LMICs relied on civil society organizations (CSOs) to assist in implementing COVID-19 response programs. Yet few studies have examined the critical role CSOs played in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in low resource settings. This study explored the CSO response to COVID-19 in five of the most heavily impacted LMICs in the Global South. Interviews were conducted from May to August 2021 with a purposive sample of CSO key informants within each of the five countries. A total of 52 CSOs were selected from which 53 key informants were interviewed either via Zoom or by phone. Interviews were coded and analyzed using NVivo or MAXQDA2020. Out of the 52 CSOs selected, 24 were national organizations, 8 were regional, and 20 were local. CSOs fell into six categories: community-based organizations, non-governmental organizations, unions/professional organizations, campaigns/social movements, research organizations/think tanks, and networks/coalitions. CSOs across all five countries adapted their missions, stretched their resources, and performed a wide range of activities that fit into five programmatic areas: food security and livelihood support, public health and medical care, cash transfer programs, risk communication and community education, and needs assessment. This qualitative analysis demonstrates the critical role CSOs played in supplementing government emergency aid response by delivering necessary resources and supporting highly vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the primary challenges they faced in doing so. Given the generally weak state of public capacity in the LMICs studied, this role was vital to responding to the pandemic

Agriculture · Civil society · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Livelihood · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research