Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Surgical provider-reported reasons for utilization of the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist at a tertiary hospital in Ghana

Bibliographic Data

ID19594582
AuthorsEyram Cyril Bansah (0000-0002-6752-7507, Catholic University College of Ghana, corresponding author), Kekeli Kodjo Adanu (0000-0003-2233-0150, University of Health and Allied Sciences, corresponding author), David Adedia (0000-0002-7899-3036, University of Health and Allied Sciences, corresponding author), Adolphina Addo–Lartey (0000-0001-8852-7189, University of Ghana, corresponding author)
EditorsHannah Hogan Leslie
Year2023
Volume3
Issue1
Pagese0001143
Publication date2023-01-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0001143
PMID36962845
OpenAlexW4315779092
LanguageEN
References cited30

Despite the established positive benefits, LMICs’ adoption of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is inadequate, with as little as 20% use. This study assessed the utilization and beliefs that drive the non-utilization of the WHO SSC among surgical providers at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) in Accra, Ghana. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 186 surgical providers at the KBTH in Ghana. Data collected included the category of personnel, awareness of the SSC, training received, previously identified barriers, and staff perceptions. Utilization and drivers associated with non-utilization of the SSC were assessed using bivariate log-binomial regression. Out of 190 surgical professionals invited, 186 gave their consent and participated in the survey, giving a response rate of 97.9%. Respondents comprised 69 (37%) surgeons, 66 (36%) anesthetists, and 51 (27%) nurses. Only 30.4% of surgical professionals always use the SSC, as advised by WHO. The majority (67.7%) of surgical professionals had received no formal training on using the WHO SSC. The proportion was highest among surgeons (81.2%) compared to anesthetists (66.7%) and nurses (51%). Surgeons were perceived by other professionals to be the least supportive of checklist use (87.6%), in contrast to nurses (96.1%) and anesthetists (93.9%). Significant drivers associated with checklist usage among surgical professionals included the SSC taking too long to complete, poor communication between anesthetist and surgeon, checklist not covering all perioperative risks, difficulty finding a coordinator, poor attitude of team members toward questions, surgical specialty/unit and training status of professionals. The checklist was always used by only a small (30%) proportion of surgical professionals at the KBTH. Improving checklist use will necessitate its careful application to all surgical operations and a cycle of periodic training that includes context-specific adjustments, checklist auditing, and feedback from local coordinators

Accreditation · Checklist · Cross-sectional study · Family medicine · Health care · Medical education · Nurse anesthetist · Patient safety · Perioperative · Specialty · Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Safety and Medication Errors · Psychology · Surgery

  • A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population

    Alex B Haynes, Thomas G Weiser et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2009

  • Effectiveness of the Surgical Safety Checklist in a High Standard Care Environment

    Anne Lübbeke, Frederique Hovaguimian et al.•Medical Care•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae