The Myth of Mob Rule
Violent Crime and Democratic Politics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20008142 |
|---|---|
| Authors | L L Miller (0000-0001-6165-2203, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Pages | 256 |
| Publication date | 2016-04-21 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Myth of Mob Rule (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190228705.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4250165357 |
| Open Library | OL28594388M |
| ISBN | 9780190228705 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 69 |
Scholars and laypersons alike routinely express doubt about the ability of democratic publics to adequately assess risk and to respond rationally when emotionally charged issues like crime are on the political agenda, particularly when race and class biases are invoked. In the United States, which has the highest imprisonment rate in the developed world, many scholars have concluded that there are simply too many opportunities for elected officials to be responsive to public opinion. Democratic accountability, in this view, should be limited because too much democracy encourages impulsive, irrational, and even murderous demands, independent of actual risk. These claims about the panic-prone masses—about the dangers of "mob rule"— are widespread and form the central focus of this book. Are democratic majorities easily drawn to crime as a political issue, even when risk of violence is low? Can they support "rational alternatives" to wholly repressive practices, even when the issue triggers racial biases and stereotypes? Drawing on a comparative analysis of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, this book explores when and with what consequences crime becomes a politically salient issue. Reversing much of the conventional wisdom, the analysis finds that serious violence and public and political attention to it are highly correlated and that the United States has high levels of both crime and punishment, in part, because it suffers from a democratic deficit, rather than a surplus, in the production of fundamental collective goods, including risk of violence
Criminology · Democracy · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Punishment (psychology) · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Deviance, and Social Control · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Crime · Crime prevention · Government policy · Political aspects · Political sociology · Violent crimes
Comments by Lisa L. Miller
Comments by Nicola Lacey
Comments by Joshua Page
From Backwaters to Major Policymakers
Politização Dos Problemas Com Crime E Polícia Durante a Transição (1983-1992)
Immigrant threat, perception of unsafety, and political articulation of immigration and multiculturalism in European countries
Beyond the austerity-driven hypothesis
Did Mass Incarceration Leave Americans Feeling Less Afraid? A Multilevel Analysis of Cumulative Imprisonment and Individual Perceptions of Fear
White riot
When social media feeds classic punitivism on media
Manufacturing concern
The Origins of Mass Incarceration
The Work
Mass support for proposals to reshape policing depends on the implications for crime and safety
The Racial Politics of Mass Incarceration
Changing Attitudes and Provoking Action
Lethal Violence and the Racialized Failure of the American State
Theoretical advances and problems in the sociology of punishment
Public opinion and the politics of collateral consequence policies
The submerged prison state
The downside of downsizing
Rachel Elise Barkow, Prisoners of Politics
To support or punish? analyzing the relationship between welfare state attitudes and penal punitiveness
Penal controls and social controls
Black women, victimization, and the limitations of the liberal state
What’s in a name and why it matters
Fracturing the penal state
Penal power at the border
The constitution of political membership’
Policy mobilities and comparative penality
Critical Junctures and Conditions of Change
Reconceptualising ‘risk’
Children, Development, and the Troubled Foundations of Miller v. Alabama
Stagnated, on the Verge of Breakthrough, or Both? The State of Big Theories of Legal Phenomena
Dilemmas of substitution
The politics of police violence
Public Opinion and Criminal Justice Policy
Don't Call It a Comeback
Police Are Our Government
Neither dupes, nor pipers
Less Eligibility, Welfare, and Punishment
Lethal Violence and the Americas
Fear or Loathing in the United States? Public Opinion and the Rise of Racial Disparity in Mass Incarceration, 1978–2015
A Threatening Tone
Racialized Anti-Statism and the Failure of the American State
The public salience of crime, 1960–2014
Can Black Lives Matter within U.S. Democracy
Holding Justice Accountable
Attitudes to Crime and Punishment in England and Wales, 1964–2023
Is the Party Really Over? Parties, Partisanship and the Politics of Crime
Crime And Punishment
Public Responsiveness to Declining Crime Rates in the United States and England and Wales
Striking the Balance? On the Relationship Between Public and Private Security in Western Countries
Interrogating Crime, Politics and Insecurity
The Return of the Slave Master
Conceptualizing and measuring “punitiveness” in contemporary advanced democracies
Whose Vote Counts for Crime Policy
Police Abuse or Just Deserts
Iron Cages and Ballot Boxes
Moral Panics and Punctuated Equilibrium in Public Policy
Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality
Penal Populism and the Public Thermostat
Located Institutions
The liberal dream of smart detention? Algorithms and the politics of pretrial detention in the US states
De-Policing America's Youth
American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment
Governing through Killing
Collaborating on the Carceral State
Policing, Democratic Participation, and the Reproduction of Asymmetric Citizenship
| Unique citing works | 69 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,67 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 66 |