Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A mirror for science

Bibliographic Data

ID20402664
AuthorsSheila Jasanoff (0000-0002-0488-8698, Harvard University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume23
Issue1
Pages21-26
Publication date2014-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Understanding of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0963662513505509
PMID24434707
OpenAlexW2099340198
LanguageEN
Citations received37
References cited14

Early conceptions of the public understanding of science suffered from a narrow framing of what science means and a presumption that science is divided from its publics by walls of ignorance and indifference. Those assumptions amplified misunderstanding and led to faulty policies. It is time to reopen each element in the term “public understanding of science” to renewed reflection. This journal can advance that goal by encouraging research on actual rather than imagined public responses to science, on representations of science in the public sphere, and on interactions between science, technology and society

Epistemology · Ignorance · Outline of social science · Political science · Presumption · Public awareness of science · Public sphere · Publics · Science communication · Science education · Science policy · Science, technology, society and environment education · Social science education · Sociology · Animal and Plant Science Education · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Engineering · Law · Philosophy · Science Education and Perceptions

  • Why Being Right Doesn’t Make You Good

    Edward Thomas Bankes•Journal of Religion and Popular…•2024

  • Technopolitical Energy Governance as Administrative Closure

    Open Access•Arash Beidollahkhani•Public Administration and…•2026

  • Making science-based natural hazard risk management work within power networks –from co-production models of knowledge transfer to the Research-Integration-Utilisation (RIU) model

    Open Access•Michael Kirchner, Max Krott•International Journal of Disaster…•2022

  • Using Nimby rhetoric as a political resource to negotiate responses to local energy infrastructure

    Susana Batel, Patrick Devine‐wright et al.•Local Environment•2020

  • Scepticism and the value of distrust

    Open Access•Maria Baghramian, Silvia Caprioglio Panizza•Inquiry•2022

  • Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies

    Open Access•Ana S Iltis, Sarah Hoover et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2021

  • Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition

    Open Access•Tomas Moe Skjølsvold, William Throndsen et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Universities in contentious energy debates—Science, democracy and coal seam gas in Australia

    Open Access•ELIZABETH HARDIE, Naomi Smith Devetak et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • How Can I Contribute? Citizen Engagement in the Development of Nanotechnology for Health

    Open Access•Sikke R Jansma, Anne M Dijkstra et al.•NanoEthics•2021

  • Why Being Right Doesn’t Make You Good

    Edward Thomas Bankes•Journal of Religion and Popular…•2023

  • Beyond and within public engagement

    Open Access•Jose A Cañada, Aaro Tupasela et al.•New Genetics and Society•2015

  • Biomedical risks and citizenship

    B De Graaff, M B de Graaff et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2015

  • Scientist Citizens

    Pamela Pietrucci, Luca Ceccarelli•Rhetoric and Public Affairs•2019

  • Laughing to love science

    Open Access•Edward Thomas Bankes•Humor - International Journal of…•2023

  • Wrong versus Right(eous)

    Open Access•Kristin Kay Barker, Alexis M Kenney et al.•Sociological Forum•2021

  • Creating energy citizenship through material participation

    Open Access•Marianne Ryghaug, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold et al.•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Governance by campaign

    Tanja Schneider, K Eli et al.•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Attitudes towards science among Spanish citizens

    Open Access•Montaña Cámara, Ana Muñoz Van Den Eynde et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • Anticipating health innovations in 2030–2040

    Open Access•P Lehoux, Fiona A Miller et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • Stylistic analysis of headlines in science journalism

    Open Access•Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • Italian parliamentary debates on energy sustainability

    Open Access•Sonia Brondi, Mauro Sarrica et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Redesigning the architecture of policy-making

    Open Access•Debashish Munshi, Priya Kurian et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Understanding “understanding” in Public Understanding of Science

    Open Access•Joanna K Huxster, Matthew H Slater et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • Chemistry in the mail

    Open Access•Madison A Krall, Melissa M Parks et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  • Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science

    Open Access•Yaela N Golumbic, Keren Dalyot et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • The Cultural Negotiation of Publics–Science Relations

    Open Access•John Mihelich, John A Mihelich et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2015

  • The reflexive scientist

    Open Access•Rhian Salmon, Rhian A Salmon et al.•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2015

  • Creative (Climate) Communications

    Open Access•Maxwell Boykoff•Creative Communications•2019

  • Co-creation in support of responsible research and innovation

    Open Access•Sikke R Jansma, Anne M Dijkstra et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2021

  • Narrative as a resource for inclusive governance

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Julia Silvia Guivant•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2020

  • Science and security expertise

    Open Access•Dagmar Rychnovská, M Pasgaard et al.•Geoforum•2017

  • What about citizens? A literature review of citizen engagement in sustainability transitions research

    Open Access•Suvi Huttunen, Maria Ojanen et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • The Development and Validation of the Social Enterprise of Science Index (Sesi)

    Open Access•Joanna K Huxster, Matthew H Slater et al.•SAGE Open•2021

  • La culture ordinaire, une heuristique des STS pour former à la médiation culturelle des sciences et techniques en société

    Michel Letté•Tréma•2018

  • Improving drug policy

    Open Access•A Ritter, K Lancaster et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2018

  • Taking the public seriously

    Open Access•Silvia Ivani, Alex Archer et al.•Synthese•2024

  • Some contributions of Habermas to the study of public communication of science

    Open Access•Ana Eliza Ferreira Alvim Da Silva, José Roberto Pereira et al.•Trans/Form/Ação•2021

  • Street Science

    Jason Corburn•Street Science•2005

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • Misunderstood misunderstandings

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Misunderstanding Science?•1996

  • Civilization and madness

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Public Understanding of Science•1997

  • Research to improve public understanding programmes

    Open Access•Walter F Bodmer, Walter Bodmer et al.•Public Understanding of Science•1992

  • Street Science

    Jason Corburn•Street Science Community…•2005

  • Turning Around Politics

    Open Access•Bruno Latour•Social Studies of Science•2007

  • What is Political in Sub-politics

    Open Access•Gerard de Vries•Social Studies of Science•2007

  • Acting in an uncertain world

    Michel Callon, Pierre Lascoumes et al.•Acting in an uncertain world•2009

  • The Idea of Public Reason and the Reason of State

    Open Access•Miguel Vatter•Political Theory•2008

  • Misunderstood misunderstanding

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Public Understanding of Science•1992

  • Science at the Bar

    Sheila Jasanoff•Science at the Bar•1995

  • Impure Science

    Open Access•Michael Bloor•Sociology of Health & Illness•1997

Unique citing works37
Citations per year3,36
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 37
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae