Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Technology and homecare in the UK

Policy, storylines and practice

Bibliographic Data

ID2116450
AuthorsKate Hamblin (0000-0001-8207-4414, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), Diane Burns (0000-0002-2011-9127, University of Sheffield), Cate Goodlad (0000-0002-6979-4051, University of Sheffield)
Year2025
Volume54
Issue2
Pages412-428
Publication date2025-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0047279423000156
OpenAlexW4365451847
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited20

UK policy discourse presents technology as a solution to challenges facing care services, including issues of quality and the mismatch between care workforce supply and demand. This discourse characterises technology as 'transformative', homogenous and wholly positive for care delivery, eliding the diversity of digital devices and systems and their varied uses. Our paper draws on data gathered through 34 interviews with care sector stakeholders and four in-depth case studies of UK homecare providers to comparatively analyse 'storylines' of technological solutions expressed by policy (macro-level), sector stakeholders (meso-level) and homecare managers and care workers (micro-level) alongside enacted experiences of technology-in-use. The 'storylines' presented by care sector stakeholders and homecare managers converged with those of the policy discourse, emphasising technology's capacity to enhance quality and efficiency. Our case studies however highlighted several implications for care work and organisational practice in homecare provision: the technologies we observed sometimes produced additional tasks and responsibilities, undermining the efficiency and quality storylines. The experiences of care providers and workers engaging with technologies in homecare warrant further investigation and greater prominence to challenge a discourse which is at times overly simplistic and optimistic

Business · Diversity (politics) · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Public relations · Quality (philosophy) · Sociology · Transformative learning · Work (physics) · Workforce · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Visible but precarious

    Open Access•Mert Koçak, Elifcan Çelebi•Journal of Social Policy•2026

  • Accountability, empathy and the digital transformation of care

    Liliya Mergaliyeva, Dongmei Cao•Information Technology and People•2026

  • How the care workforce navigates the digital ‘skills gap’

    Open Access•Grace J Whitfield, Erika Kispeter et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2025

  • Digital Futures in an Ageing Society

    Open Access•Freja Morris, F J A Morris et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2026

  • The gig economy, platform work, and social policy

    Open Access•Tat Chor Au‐yeung, Chris King-Chi Chan et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2025

  • The social shaping of technology

    Open Access•Robin Williams, David Edge•Research Policy•1996

  • Time is more important than anything else”

    Anne Mcdonald, Luciana Lolich et al.•International Journal of Care and…•2019

  • Known Knowns, Known Unknowns, Unknown Unknowns

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Geoff Wong et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2011

  • Taking worker productivity to a new level? Electronic Monitoring in homecare—the (re)production of unpaid labour

    Open Access•Sian Moore, Lydia Hayes et al.•New Technology Work and Employment•2017

  • Technologies in caregiving

    Open Access•Holger Højlund, K Villadsen•New Technology Work and Employment•2020

  • If telecare is the answer, what was the question? Storylines, tensions and the unintended consequences of technology-supported care

    Open Access•Jennifer Lynch, Jennifer K Lynch et al.•Critical Social Policy•2019

  • Remote care technologies, older people and the social care crisis in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Andrew Eccles•Ageing and Society•2021

  • Coercive Care

    Donna Baines, Diane Van Den Broek•The British Journal of Social Work•2017

  • Technology in care systems

    Open Access•Kate Hamblin•New Technology Work and Employment•2022

  • Thematic networks

    Open Access•Jennifer Attride-Stirling, Jennifer Attride‐Stirling•Qualitative Research•2001

  • Theory Construction in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Stefan Timmerman, Iddo Tavory•Sociological Theory•2012

  • When Caring and Surveillance Technology Meet

    Open Access•Kenneth Brown, Marek Korczynski•Work and Occupations•2010

  • Innovation and evaluation

    Open Access•J Pols, Dick L Willems et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2011

  • Digitally Networked Social Services

    Open Access•Paul Henman, Dan Dai et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2024

  • A lost decade? A renewed case for adult social care reform in England

    Open Access•Jon Glasby, Yanan Zhang et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2021

Unique citing works5
Citations per year5
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae