Spreading Success Beyond the Laboratory
Applying the RE-AIM Framework for Effective Environmental Communication Interventions at Scale
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21192576 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Neil Stenhouse (0000-0003-3532-7874, University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 756-768 |
| Publication date | 2017-11-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1752-4032 • E-ISSN: 1752-4040 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289110 |
| OpenAlex | W3125472636 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 29 |
The RE-AIM framework, created by Russell Glasgow and colleagues, addresses five major factors involved with sustained population-level effectiveness of public health interventions—Reach, Efficacy and/or Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. In this article, I illustrate how the framework might be applied to environmental communication interventions, and discuss how the framework needs to be adapted to important aspects of this context. Following that, I address several potential criticisms of RE-AIM or its usefulness for environmental communication scholars. Finally, I discuss how research practices of environmental communication scholars could be changed in light of the insights given by the RE-AIM framework. Much work remains to be done in order to see exactly how RE-AIM, or other frameworks focused on large-scale intervention effectiveness, can be made most useful to environmental communication scholars. However, RE-AIM already provides a valuable way to start thinking about how to best improve large-scale effectiveness of communication interventions
Behavior change communication · Engineering ethics · Environmental health · Geography · Management science · Political science · Population · Psychological intervention · Public relations · Research methodology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Medicine · Psychology · Social Media and Politics
Research Findings Practitioners Resist
Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs
Albert and Whetten Revisited
Site Selection Bias in Program Evaluation
Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Reflections on Environmental Communication and the Challenges of a New Research Agenda
Integrating Media Studies of Climate Change into Transdisciplinary Research
Public Communication Campaigns
Public Communication Campaigns
The RE-AIM Framework
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions
Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition
Designing for Dissemination Among Public Health Researchers
Bridging the Research-Practice Gap in Climate Communication
A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability
Health Campaign Channels Tradeoffs Among Reach, Specificity, and Impact
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2022 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |