Predictability and perception for native and non-native listeners
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21226563 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melissa M Baese‐berk (0000-0002-4855-9319, University of Oregon, corresponding author), Melissa Baese-Berk (University of Oregon), Tuuli H Morrill, Tuuli Morrill, Laura C Dilley (0000-0002-1667-8575, Michigan State University), Laura Dilley (Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI , USA) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | s2 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics Vanguard (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2199-174X • E-ISSN: 2199-174X |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/lingvan-2017-0022 |
| OpenAlex | W2886602350 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 35 |
Phonological knowledge is influenced by a variety of cues that reflect predictability (e.g. semantic predictability). Listeners utilize various aspects of predictability when determining what they have heard. In the present paper, we ask how aspects of the acoustic phonetic signal (e.g. speaking rate) interact with other knowledge reflecting predictability (e.g. lexical frequency and collocation strength) to influence how speech is perceived. Specifically, we examine perception of function words by native and non-native speakers. Our results suggest that both native and non-native speakers are sensitive to factors that influence the predictability of the signal, including speaking rate, frequency, and collocation strength, when listening to speech, and use these factors to predict the phonological structure of stretches of ambiguous speech. However, reliance on these cues differs as a function of their experience and proficiency with the target language. Non-native speakers are less sensitive to some aspects of the acoustic phonetic signal (e.g. speaking rate). However, they appear to be quite sensitive to other factors, including frequency. We discuss how these results inform our understanding of the interplay between predictability and speech perception by different listener populations and how use of features reflecting predictability interacts with recovery of phonological structure of spoken language
Active listening · Cognitive psychology · Linguistics · Perception · Predictability · Speech perception · Speech recognition · Communication · Computer Science · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Mathematics · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Probabilistic relations between words
Robust speech perception
PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python
Epenthetic vowels in Japanese
The dynamics of attending
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Loci and locality of informational effects on phonetic implementation
Assessing predictability effects in connected read speech
The interdependence of frequency, predictability, and informativity in the segmental domain
Intelligibility Versus Redundancy - Conditions of Dependency
Time Factors in Perception of A Double Consonant
Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech
Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage
The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context
Time and Thyme Are not Homophones
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |