“If We Don't Have Diversity, There's No Future to See”
High‐school students' perceptions of race and gender representation in STEM
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392644 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne E Martins (0000-0003-0737-5836, Department of Educational Policy Studies Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA, corresponding author), Anne E Martin (Department of Educational Policy Studies Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA), Teresa R Fisher‐Ari (0000-0003-2833-9738, Department of Early Childhood and Elementary Education Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1076-1099 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21677 |
| OpenAlex | W3195169447 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 45 |
The perceptions of students interested in STEM, particularly those too often excluded due to race and/or gender, are necessary to create educational experiences that additively contribute to students' access and inclusion in STEM. The purpose of this inquiry was to understand the perceptions of 34 high‐school students about race and gender representation in STEM. Students participated in a 3‐week, university‐sponsored summer programme geared toward teaching and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). At the end of the programme, we interviewed students about STEM in their community, STEM role models, potentially working in a STEM field, barriers to STEM, and why they think White men are disproportionately represented in STEM fields. Guided by a critical framework with an intersectional lens, qualitative content analysis of interview data centered on the descriptive codes “race” and “gender” using a constant comparative analytic approach. Results indicated that participants (1) drew on family role models in STEM, (2) used White privilege and patriarchy at varying levels to explain exclusion from STEM, (3) described limited, stereotypical, and hidden depictions of race and gender in STEM, and (4) often perceived STEM as "pushed" while not explicitly associating STEM with helping, or giving back to their community. Implications drawn from participant perspectives call for educational endeavors that expand dominant conceptions of who and what is considered STEM, center students' families and communities, utilize a problem‐based approach positioning STEM as a tool for social justice, and include direct conversations about gendered racism and stereotypes
Content analysis · Diversity (politics) · Inclusion (mineral) · Mathematics education · Race (biology) · Social science · Sociology · Career Development and Diversity · Early Childhood Education and Development · Education, Achievement, and Giftedness · Gender Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Toward an Understanding of Self-Efficacy Development as a Sociocultural Process
Diverse social robot ethnicity performance in the classroom facilitated more expansive robot identity exploration in boys
Strength-based strategies and assets that Black and Latina/o middle and high school students use to navigate contextual barriers of math engagement
Examining the Relationships between Teacher Self-Disclosure and Emotional and Behavioral Engagement of STEM Undergraduate Research Scholars
Formulating a framework on social responsibility of science in primary science education
Commentary—misconceiving merit
Racially diverse educational pathways and STEM college outcomes
Not the only novice in the room
Why are some students “not into” computational thinking activities embedded within high school science units? Key takeaways from a microethnographic discourse analysis study
STEM‐related outcomes for adolescents with differing perceptions of school racial climate
The reverse Matilda effect
A holistic understanding of inclusion in STEM
The Perspectives of University Students Working With Rural Schools
American adolescents’ political perceptions and aspirations before and after the 2024 presidential election
Decolonising the ivory tower
Racialized School Experiences, STEM Class Belonging and Academic Coping
Not “Cut Out” For the Field
Developmental Relationships as a critical lever for equitable math learning
Minoritized Scientists in the United States
Black girls speak STEM
How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers
An anti‐deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM
(Un)Hidden Figures
The Troubled Success of Black Women in STEM
Changing the field
Asian American women in STEM in the lab with “White Men Named John”
“You could like science and not be a science person ”
Meritocracy 2.0
Of models and myths
Conflicting narratives of success in mathematics and science education
Racial battle fatigue and activist burnout in racial justice activists of color at predominately White colleges and universities
Feeling like an “Alien” or “Family”? Comparing students and faculty experiences of diversity in STEM disciplines at a PWI and an HBCU
Women and science careers
Gender Bias in STEM Fields
Perceived Gender and Racial/Ethnic Barriers to STEM Success
Only STEM Can Save Us? Examining Race, Place, and STEM Education as Property
Whose STEM? Disrupting the Gender Crisis Within STEM
Devalued Black and Latino Racial Identities
From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt
Dismantling Stereotypes About Latinos in STEM
Barriers to the advancement of women of color faculty in STEM
Swimming Against the Tide
Critical Race Theory, Latino Critical Theory, and Critical Raced-Gendered Epistemologies
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |