Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Redesign or relabel? How a commercial curriculum and its implementation oversimplify key features of the NGSS

Bibliographic Data

ID21392695
AuthorsBenjamin R Lowell (0000-0001-5716-6173, Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Society, Lynch School of Education and Human Development Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts USA, corresponding author), Kevin Cherbow (0000-0003-4281-4806, Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Society, Lynch School of Education and Human Development Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts USA), Katherine L Mcneill (0000-0003-3673-6637, Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Society, Lynch School of Education and Human Development Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts USA)
Year2021
Volume105
Issue1
Pages5-32
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sce.21604
OpenAlexW3096016131
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited50

The adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) requires many teachers to drastically change their classroom instruction. Curricular materials offer a tool to support this transition, but there are questions about the degree to which available curricula truly reflect the shifts required by the NGSS. This study proposes a framework of four key elements of NGSS design that can be used to analyze both curriculum and instruction for alignment to the NGSS. The four key elements include phenomenon‐based, three‐dimensional, supports student epistemic agency, and coherent. We used this analytic framework to analyze one commercially available middle school curriculum and its implementation in two classrooms. We found that the curriculum and instruction oversimplified the complex vision of science learning required by using natural phenomena primarily as hooks or examples, creating lessons in which students engaged in core ideas and science practices but separately in service of different goals, placing the cognitive load on the teacher to do most of the sensemaking rather than the students, and having the teacher, rather than the students, build coherence between the lessons. Our work suggests that future curriculum should focus on asking students to tell a how and why story around a phenomenon to support three‐dimensionality, student epistemic agency, and coherence. Furthermore, future work should explore how educative elements can highlight and illustrate the vision of NGSS‐aligned instruction and the use of well‐aligned curricula in a variety of settings including curriculum‐based professional development

Agency (philosophy) · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Curriculum · Engineering ethics · Mathematics education · Next Generation Science Standards · Pedagogy · Science education · Sociology · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Engineering · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy

  • Phenomenon-based learning and storylines in K-12 science education

    Open Access•Kate Walker, Kate Ireton Walker et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Supporting teachers through curriculum-based professional learning

    Katherine L Mcneill, Renee Affolter et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2025

  • Making for science

    Open Access•Cassia Fernandez, Tatiana Hochgreb et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2024

  • Developing Primary School Students’ Abilities to Evaluate the Evidence of Written Scientific Arguments

    Open Access•Michael Skoumios•Science & Education•2023

  • Teacher enactment of the crosscutting concepts in next generation science classrooms

    Open Access•Jasmine Marckwordt, Kimberly Nguyen et al.•Science Education•2022

  • A comparison of elementary teachers' verbal supports for students in inclusive and general classroom contexts during an NGSS‐aligned science, engineering, and computer science unit

    Open Access•Sarah Lilly, Anne M McAlister et al.•Science Education•2023

  • Getting to a good place with science instruction

    Open Access•Douglas B Larkin•Science Education•2022

  • Leveraging curricular and students' resources to instigate and sustain problematizing

    Open Access•Mon‐Lin Monica Ko•Science Education•2021

  • Collective (Un)Learning

    Open Access•María González‐howard, Karina Méndez Pérez et al.•Science Education•2026

  • Revisiting the Teacher‐Curriculum Relationship

    Open Access•Kevin Cherbow, Katherine L Mcneill et al.•Science Education•2026

  • Organizational sensemaking during curriculum implementation

    Open Access•Benjamin R Lowell, Sarah E Fogelman et al.•Science Education•2024

  • The student hat in professional development

    Open Access•Benjamin R Lowell•Science Education•2024

  • Changes in teachers' beliefs

    Open Access•Benjamin R Lowell, Katherine L Mcneill•Journal of Research in Science…•2023

  • Preservice elementary teachers' perceptions of their science laboratory instructors in a phenomena‐based laboratory and how it impacts their conceptual development

    Open Access•Alvir S Sangha, Dermot Donnelly‐hermosillo et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2024

  • Defining sensemaking

    Open Access•Tor Ole B Odden, Rosemary S Russ•Science Education•2019

  • “The Coat Traps All Your Body Heat”

    Ann S Rosebery, Mark Ogonowski et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2010

  • Misconceptions Reconceived

    John P Smith, John P Smith III et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•1994

  • Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities

    Open Access•David Stroupe•Science Education•2014

  • Strengthening the Research Base That Informs STEM Instructional Improvement Efforts

    Open Access•Kathleen Lynch, Kathleen S Lynch et al.•Educational Evaluation and Policy…•2019

  • Epistemologies in practice

    Open Access•Leema K Berland, Christina V Schwarz et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2016

  • Accommodation of a scientific conception

    Open Access•George J Posner, Kenneth A Strike et al.•Science Education•1982

  • Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room

    Open Access•Emily Adah Miller, Eve Manz et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2018

  • Sciience

    Open Access•Joan N Kaderavek, Tamala North et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2015

  • Educative Curriculum Materials

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Davis, Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar et al.•Educational Researcher•2017

  • Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Davis, Joseph Krajcik et al.•Educational Researcher•2005

  • What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning

    Open Access•Ralph T Putnam, Harold Borko et al.•Educational Researcher•2000

  • Preparing Teachers to Design Sequences of Instruction in Earth Systems Science

    Open Access•W R Penuel, Lawrence P Gallagher et al.•American Educational Research…•2011

  • Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning

    Mary Kay Stein, Barbara W Grover et al.•American Educational Research…•1996

  • Nature-culture constructs in science learning

    Open Access•Megan Bang, Ananda Marin•Journal of Research in Science…•2015

  • Teaching Scientific Practices

    Jonathan Osborne•Journal of Science Teacher…•2014

  • Shared Epistemic Agency

    Crina Damşa, Crina I Damşa et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2010

  • Desettling Expectations in Science Education

    Open Access•Megan Bang, Beth Warren et al.•Human Development•2012

Unique citing works14
Citations per year2,8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae