Interlocking models in classroom science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392729 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eve Manz (0000-0003-3395-2449, Boston University Wheelock College of Education and Human Development Boston Massachussetts USA, corresponding author), Chris Georgen (Boston University Wheelock College of Education and Human Development Boston Massachussetts USA) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 107 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1399-1434 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21806 |
| OpenAlex | W4385118103 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 73 |
Both professional and classroom‐based scientific communities develop and test explanatory models of the natural world. For students to take up models as tools for sensemaking, practice must be agentive (where students use and revise models for specific purposes) and conceptually productive (where students make progress on their ideas). In this paper, we explore principles to support agentive and conceptually productive modeling. One is that models can “do work”; that is, participate in students' sensemaking by offering resources, making gaps visible, or pushing back on modelers' understandings. A second is that working across, and seeking to align, multiple models—what we explain as interlocking models—supports models to do work. A third is that modeling activity can support fine‐grained conceptual progress. We detail how we used these ideas to guide and refine the design of a fifth‐grade investigation into the conservation of matter across phase change. We identify four ways that models participated in students' sensemaking as they interlocked: by providing contradictions , constraints , representational surplus , and gaps for students to engage with. We discuss how designing for models to be co‐participants in sense‐making and to interlock can provide productive paths forward for curriculum designers, researchers, and teachers
Conceptual change · Curriculum · Epistemology · Interlocking · Knowledge management · Mathematics education · Next Generation Science Standards · Pedagogy · Science education · Scientific modelling · Sensemaking · Sociology · Work (physics) · Animal and Plant Science Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
How students develop collaborative drawing to represent the transmission of sound
Connecting Design and Experience
From Everyday Thinking to Systems Thinking
Understanding the Relational Dimensions of Classroom Modeling Conversations
“That's Our Question!”
Development of an Observation Protocol for Teachers' Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Science Instruction
Elevating Configurations of Data and Emotion
Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education
Articulating the World
Creating Scientific Concepts
Cognition in the Wild
Defining sensemaking
Learning to Feel Like a Scientist
Design Experiments
Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling
Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools
Epistemologies in practice
Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education
Chapter 4
‘Models of’ versus ‘Models for’
Beyond the scientific method
Storyline Units
The Dappled World
Embodied physics
Developing and Using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues
Scientific modeling and translanguaging
“Estoy Explorando Science”
Supporting students' meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages
Beyond assessing knowledge about models and modeling
Engineering Concepts
Preparations, models, and simulations
How Models Are Used to Represent Reality
Design Experiments in Educational Research
The Mangle of Practice
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |