Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Emergent learning about measurement and uncertainty in an inquiry context

A case from an elementary classroom

Bibliographic Data

ID21392740
AuthorsXiaowei Tang (0000-0002-9363-6248, Faculty of Education University of Macau Taipa Macao China, corresponding author), Gang Shu (0000-0002-0610-9635, Yanghe Garden Elementary School Chongqing China), Bing Wei (0000-0002-5591-8025, Faculty of Education University of Macau Taipa Macao China), Daniel M Levin (0000-0001-6806-4228, Department of Teaching and Learning, Policy and Leadership University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA)
Year2024
Volume108
Issue1
Pages308-331
Publication date2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sce.21837
OpenAlexW4387331537
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited45

Students often learn about measurement uncertainty as an isolated topic, with a focus on generalizable strategies to manage uncertainty in scientific investigation. In this study, we report and analyze a case of emergent learning about measurement and uncertainty, in which students in a Chinese elementary school science class explored and reconciled discrepancies in hypotheses by constructing and using measures and making inferences. Adopting a model‐based view of measurement, we show that when allowed to take on emergent measurement uncertainty while inquiring into causes for phenomena, late elementary students with no prior experience can engage in sophisticated reasoning characterized by a variety of theoretical modeling practices. Developing and aligning models of the phenomenon, the measure and the measurement data supported students in constructing an intuitive solution to their discrepancies. Our analysis also identified (1) a pattern of thinking and some common assumptions students adopted in their modeling practice that were productive, and (2) contextual elements affording and constraining emergent learning on measurement and uncertainty. In our discussion, we reflect on the educational potential of adopting a model‐based account of measurement and of treating measurement and uncertainty as integrated into investigative practice. We also discuss the necessary contexts for realizing the potential of the model‐based account

Class (philosophy) · Context (archaeology) · Data mining · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Management science · Mathematics education · Measure (data warehouse) · Science education · Scientific modelling · Scientific reasoning · Uncertainty analysis · Variety (cybernetics) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Innovative Teaching Methods · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Statistics Education and Methodologies

  • Exploring students’ engagement with inscription-based science practices from the perspective of epistemic (un)certainty

    Hee‐sun Lee, Amy Pallant et al.•International Journal of Science…•2025

  • Chinese Grade 12 Students’ Cognition and Coping Ways of Uncertainty in Science

    Open Access•Jingxuan Lei, Zhiyu Huang et al.•Science & Education•2026

  • Connecting Design and Experience

    Open Access•Eve Manz, Alessandra Ward et al.•Science Education•2026

  • “I think of it that way and it helps me understand”

    Open Access•Xiaowei Tang, David Hammer•Science Education•2024

  • An Integrative Framework for Navigating Uncertainty in Science Education

    Open Access•Simon Blauza, Kerstin Kremer et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2025

  • Full House

    Stephen J Gould•Full House•1996

  • Supporting teachers to negotiate uncertainty for science, students, and teaching

    Open Access•Eve Manz, Enrique Suarez•Science Education•2018

  • Educational Implications of Choosing “Practice” to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards

    Open Access•Michael J Ford•Science Education•2015

  • Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement

    Randi A Engle, Faith R Conant•Cognition and Instruction•2002

  • Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms

    Open Access•Katherine L Mcneill, Diane Silva Pimentel•Science Education•2010

  • Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Raymond S Nickerson•Review of General Psychology•1998

  • Characterizing pedagogical decision points in sense‐making conversations motivated by scientific uncertainty

    Open Access•Jessica Watkins, Eve Manz•Science Education•2022

  • Rethinking the classroom science investigation

    Open Access•Eve Manz, Ronald Lehrer et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2020

  • Introducing Children to Modeling Variability

    Open Access•Ronald Lehrer, Richard Lehrer et al.•International handbook of…•2018

  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

    Mark S Massa•Structure of Theological…•2018

  • Radical Uncertainty in Scientific Discovery Work

    Open Access•Wolff-Michael Roth•Science Technology & Human Values•2009

  • Outline of a general model of measurement

    Open Access•Aldo Frigerio, Alessandro Giordani et al.•Synthese•2010

  • The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts

    Leona Schauble•Developmental Psychology•1996

  • Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement

    Open Access•Eran Tal•Philosophy Compass•2013

  • The Mangle of Practice

    Andrew Pickering•Mangle of Practice•1995

Unique citing works5
Citations per year2,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae