Measuring epistemic knowledge development related to scientific experimentation practice
A construct modeling approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392767 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hee‐sun Lee (0000-0002-4673-5008, The Concord Consortium Concord Massachusetts USA, corresponding author), Gey‐Hong Gweon (Physics Front Scotts Valley California USA), Gey-Hong Gweon (0000-0002-4026-6343, Bethany University), Aubree Webb (The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Malden Massachusetts USA), Dan Damelin (The Concord Consortium Concord Massachusetts USA), Chad Dorsey (0000-0003-1932-1667, The Concord Consortium Concord Massachusetts USA) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 383-411 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21836 |
| OpenAlex | W4387332187 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 62 |
This study addresses the measurement of high school students' epistemic knowledge associated with scientific experimentation (EKSE) which concerns how scientific experimentation generates knowledge and why that knowledge is justified. Based on philosophical, educational standards, and literature analyses, an EKSE construct is characterized as (1) underlying students' decisions and reasoning elicited during experiment design, data collection/measurement, and data analysis/interpretation and (2) progressing in five levels of sophistication: no information, nascent, dogmatic, contextualized, and reflective. This study psychometrically examined the structure of the EKSE construct using the construct modeling approach. An instrument was designed to ask students decisions and reasoning encountered while carrying out the activities embedded in experimental inquiry. High school students took the instrument as a pretest and a posttest to a physics curriculum where they learned to carry out independent scientific experiments. Results indicate that (1) all decisions and reasoning taking place during experiment design, data collection/measurement, and data analysis/interpretation contribute to the EKSE construct, (2) epistemic knowledge develops in the hypothesized order, (3) scientifically aligned decisions are likely to occur when students' epistemic knowledge is at or higher than the dogmatic level, and (4) students' EKSE can improve after engaging in a curriculum that encourages independent scientific experimentation with materials. Implications of these results and further research are discussed
Construct (python library) · Curriculum · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Philosophy of science · Science education · Scientific modelling · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Sophistication · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
Desirable uncertainty in science teaching
Teacher strategies to support student navigation of uncertainty
Hands‐on and Minds‐on? Findings on the Instructional Support of Preschool Teachers to Foster Children's Understanding of Scientific Practices
Science teachers' perceptions and practice of uncertainty in science learning
Pisa 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
Supporting teachers to negotiate uncertainty for science, students, and teaching
Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry
TAPping into argumentation
Effects of Local Item Dependence on the Fit and Equating Performance of the Three-Parameter Logistic Model
Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling
Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education?
Educational Implications of Choosing “Practice” to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards
Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities
Scaling Performance Assessments
On the Goals of Epistemic Education
Epistemologies in practice
Explanation‐driven inquiry
Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation
Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations
Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation
Grasp of evidence
Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity
The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Representing and Intervening
Performance of Polytomous IRT Models With Rating Scale Data
Assessing scientific reasoning competencies of pre-service science teachers
Development of scientific reasoning test measuring control of variables strategy in physics for high school students
Scientific reasoning and views on the nature of scientific inquiry
Students' adherences to epistemic understanding in evaluating scientific claims
Rethinking the classroom science investigation
Epistemic uncertainty and the support of productive struggle during scientific modeling for knowledge co‐development
Developing deep learning in science classrooms
Teaching the control-of-variables strategy
The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts
Teaching Scientific Practices
Science Education in Three-Part Harmony
The Mangle of Practice
Situated Learning
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |