Exploring the role of coherence in science teachers’ sensemaking of science‐specific formative assessment in professional development
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sara C Heredia (0000-0003-2553-0270, Teacher Education and Higher Education University of North Carolina at Greensboro Greensboro North Carolina, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 104 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 581-604 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21561 |
| OpenAlex | W2999866786 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 41 |
This study explores the role of conceptual coherence in science teacher learning of science‐specific formative assessment. Conceptual coherence refers to the alignment of ideas about teaching and learning and may be difficult with certain teaching practices, like formative assessment, that have a central role in accountability mechanisms in schools. The case study analyzes how one department of science teachers surfaced and managed issues of coherence as they developed and implemented science‐specific formative assessments during a 3‐year, job‐embedded professional development program. The issues of coherence shifted over the course of the 3 years of professional development as organizational changes happened at the district and the school. These shifting sources of incoherence resulted in varied uptake and use of the resources provided through professional development. When the source of incoherence was with changes introduced by the district or the school administration, the teachers did not leverage the resources provided by the professional development team. However, when the teachers surfaced issues of coherence in their classroom instruction, the science teachers relied on the professional development resources in their sensemaking. The results of this study have implications for the design of science teacher professional learning to provide teachers opportunities to manage sources of incoherence as they work to implement new instructional practices in their classrooms
Accountability · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Educational leadership · Faculty Development · Formative assessment · Mathematics education · Nature of Science · Next Generation Science Standards · Pedagogy · Political science · Professional development · Public relations · Science education · Sensemaking · Sociology · Teacher Leadership · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Making Sense of Genetic Complexity
Critical Review of Formative Assessment Practices Implemented in English Language Learning Programs in Sindh
Teachers’ sensemaking of conducting a public lesson in China
A Systematic Review of Teacher Prerequisites for Integrating Technology‐Supported Formative Assessment in K–12 STEM Education
Why do teachers vary in their instructional change during science PD? The role of noticing students in an iterative change process
Science Teachers' Management of Conflicting Institutional Logics
A case study of science teachers' goal conflicts arising when integrating engineering into science classes
How facilitating K–12 professional development shapes science faculty's instructional change
Leveraging portfolios in professional development for middle school science teachers' assessment and data‐use practice
Organizational sensemaking during curriculum implementation
Learning Progression–Based Assessments
Leading instructional improvement in elementary science
Asset and deficit discourses of student ideas in science formative assessment co‐design
Teacher curricular sensemaking
Formative assessment practices in science education
Formative assessment practice progressions for teacher preparation
A Relational Perspective on Instructional System Coherence
Figuring Out My Part in All of This”
Factors Influencing Science Teachers' Professional Development
How do organizational conditions inform teachers’ equity self‐efficacy and implementation during professional development
The Role of Habitus, Structure, and Agency in the Implementation of Science Reform Practices
Recontextualization in Multilingual Science Teacher Professional Learning
This isn't school, you know
A Case Study of Preservice Science Teachers' Enactment of Co‐Designed Formative Assessment Practices in a Chemistry Laboratory Setting
Course‐Based Teacher Professional Communities (With District and Union Support) at the Center of Three‐Dimensional Science Teaching
Bridging Student Funds of Knowledge With Science Discourse
Understanding Science Teacher Learning as Situated in Organizational Contexts
Using the Lenses of Organizational Culture and Climate for Research on Science Teacher Professional Learning
Students Really Benefited From That Hybridization
Instructional Program Coherence
Teaching Replays, Teaching Rehearsals, and Re-Visions of Practice
Collective Sensemaking about Reading
Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking
Sensemaking in Organizations
Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice
Research–Practice Partnerships in Education
Crafting Coherence
Organizing Research and Development at the Intersection of Learning, Implementation, and Design
The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture
Attending to Problems of Practice
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
A Case Study of Teacher Personal Practice Assessment Theories and Complexities of Implementing Formative Assessment
Studying Teachers’ Sensemaking to Investigate Teachers’ Responses to Professional Development Focused on New Standards
Improving Impact Studies of Teachers' Professional Development
Audiovisual Records as a Primary Data Source
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 29 |