Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Informing research on generative artificial intelligence from a language and literacy perspective

A meta‐synthesis of studies in science education

Bibliographic Data

ID21392879
AuthorsKok‐sing Tang (0000-0002-2764-539X, School of Education Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume108
Issue5
Pages1329-1355
Publication date2024-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sce.21875
OpenAlexW4396220837
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited105

Research in languages and literacies in science education (LLSE) has developed substantial theoretical and pedagogical insights into how students learn science through language, discourse, and multimodal representations. At the same time, language is central to the functioning of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). On this common basis concerning the role of language, this paper explores how foundational ideas from LLSE studies can inform the use of GenAI in science education. A bibliometric analysis of 412 journal articles from Web of Science provided the initial step to identify major themes and relationships in the LLSE literature. The analysis revealed four clusters of research in LLSE: reading and writing scientific text, science discourse and interaction, multilingual science classroom, and multimodality and representations. Each cluster was further analyzed through close reading of selected articles to identify and connect key constructs to the potential use of GenAI. These constructs include the interactive‐constructive reading model, text genre, reading‐writing integration, dialogic interaction, critical questioning, argumentation, translanguaging, hybridity, thematic pattern, modal affordance, and transduction. From these ideas and connections, the paper recommends several pedagogical principles for science educators to guide the use of GenAI. It concludes that LLSE research offers valuable insights for researchers and teachers to investigate and design the use of GenAI in science education. In turn, the impending use of GenAI also calls for a rethinking of literacy that will shape future research in LLSE

Affordance · Argumentation theory · Constructive · Dialogic · Generative grammar · Linguistics · Literacy · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Reading (process) · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Second Language Learning and Teaching

  • AI-textuality

    Open Access•Kok‐sing Tang•Applied Linguistics•2025

  • “Generative AI literacy across education and business

    Open Access•Michael Reicho, Kathrin Otrel-Cass et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Applying Artificial Intelligence in a Comparative Study of Science Images from Vietnamese and Taiwanese Textbooks

    Open Access•Dieu-Huy Lu, Yun-Ping Ge•International Journal of Science…•2026

  • ‘This might sound like I’m wearing a tinfoil hat…’ – Knowledge workers’ perceptions of privacy and surveillance in group-based communicative AI

    Open Access•Liisa Mäkinen, Minna Koivula et al.•Convergence The International…•2025

  • Examining generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in assessing students’ responses to socio-scientific issues in physics

    Surya Gumilar, Yann Shiou Ong et al.•International Journal of Science…•2025

  • Paper-based or digital tool

    Moonhyun Han•International Journal of Science…•2026

  • Creating adaptive learning pathways for inquiry-based learning in school science using generative AI large language models

    Open Access•Mafor Penn, Umesh Ramnarain•International Journal of Science…•2025

  • Generative AI as the New Frontier in Science Education

    Open Access•Sevgi Aydın, Alper Durukan et al.•Science & Education•2026

  • Generative Artificial Intelligence and Extended Cognition in Science Learning Contexts

    Open Access•Ángel Rivera-Novoa, Daniel Augusto Duarte Arias•Science & Education•2026

  • Theorizing AI literacy development using Habermas' three cognitive knowledge interests from a systematic review

    Open Access•Yuk Mui Elly Heung, Hubin Yin et al.•Computers & Education•2026

  • Generative Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted STEM Education

    Open Access•Yifan Zhu, Haozhe Jiang et al.•European Journal of Education•2026

  • Communicating the environment through artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Gökhan Uyanık•The Journal of Educational Research•2025

  • From founding voices to future visions

    Open Access•Magdalena Kersting, Kristina Danielsson et al.•International Journal of Science…•2024

  • Investigating High School Students’ Attitudes Toward the Use of AI in Education

    Open Access•Sarah Sok, Kimkong Heng et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Claiming the research expertise on human-GenAI interaction for sociolinguistics

    Open Access•Kok‐sing Tang•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2024

  • Reading Images

    Gunther Kress, Teho Van Leeuwen et al.•Reading Images•2006

  • A review of research on metacognition in science education

    Anat Zohar, Shuli Barzilai•Studies in Science Education•2013

  • Examining Science Education in ChatGPT

    Open Access•Grant Cooper•Journal of Science Education and…•2023

  • Chapter 1 Developing Socially Just Subject-Matter Instruction

    Open Access•Elizabeth Birr Moje•Review of Research in Education•2007

  • Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education

    Open Access•Qi Xia, Thomas K F Chiu et al.•Computers and Education:…•2023

  • Examining the literacy component of science literacy

    Larry D Yore, Larry Yore et al.•International Journal of Science…•2003

  • ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning

    Open Access•Lucas Kohnke, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse et al.•RELC Journal•2023

  • How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy

    Open Access•Stephen P Norris, Linda M Phillips•Science Education•2003

  • The Double Invention of Komo

    Jay Wright•The Double Invention of Komo•1998

  • Competing visions of artificial intelligence in education—A heuristic analysis on sociotechnical imaginaries and problematizations in policy guidelines

    Open Access•Cornelia Linderoth, Magnus Hultén et al.•Policy Futures in Education•2024

  • Exploring high school biology students’ discussions of multi-genre texts

    Matthew Kloser, Catherine Floyd et al.•International Journal of Science…•2023

  • Assessing early primary students’ growth in a science unit using multiple modes of representation

    Rachel Wilson, Rachel E Wilson et al.•International Journal of Science…•2021

  • Retracted Article

    Erasmos Charamba•International Journal of Science…•2020

  • Textbook and popular science text reading

    Rogério G Nigro•International Journal of Science…•2022

  • Supporting Spanish 11th grade students to make scientific writing when learning chemistry in English

    Juan Quílez•International Journal of Science…•2021

  • The Role of Materiality in an Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Kok‐sing Tang, Grant Cooper•Science & Education•2025

  • Representations of science content in a primary classroom

    Open Access•Kristina Danielsson, Fredrik Jeppsson et al.•Science Education•2023

  • Scientific argumentation and responsive teaching

    Open Access•Mark Felton, Daniel M Levin et al.•Science Education•2022

  • Plan‐Draw‐Evaluate (PDE) pattern in students' collaborative drawing

    Open Access•Joonhyeong Park, Kok‐sing Tang et al.•Science Education•2021

  • Undergraduate biology students' model‐based reasoning in the laboratory

    Open Access•Mari Sjøberg, Anniken Furberg et al.•Science Education•2023

  • Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media

    Open Access•Dietmar Höttecke, Douglas Allchin•Science Education•2020

  • Acting with epistemic agency

    Open Access•María González‐howard, Katherine L Mcneill•Science Education•2020

  • An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts

    Open Access•Marina Martins, Fabrizio Macagno•Science Education•2022

  • Can AI be racist? Color‐evasiveness in the application of machine learning to science assessments

    Open Access•Tina Cheuk•Science Education•2021

  • Bias, bias everywhere

    Open Access•Christina Krist, Marcus Kubsch•Journal of Research in Science…•2023

  • Can we and should we use artificial intelligence for formative assessment in science

    Open Access•Tingting Li, Emily Reigh et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2023

  • Material inquiry and transformation as prerequisite processes of scientific argumentation

    Open Access•Kok‐sing Tang•Journal of Research in Science…•2022

  • AI and formative assessment

    Open Access•Xiaoming Zhai, Ross H Nehm•Journal of Research in Science…•2023

  • The Work of Language in Multicultural Classrooms

    Katherine Richardson Bruna, Kimberley Gomez•Work of Language in Multicultural…•2009

  • Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis Methodologies

    Open Access•Heather Leary, Andrew Walker•TechTrends•2018

  • Bilingual education in the 21st century

    G Richard Tucker•Journal of Multilingual and…•2011

  • Articulating communities

    Open Access•J L Lemke•Journal of Research in Science…•2001

  • Writing in Multimodal Texts

    Open Access•Jacob Bezemer, Jeff Bezemer et al.•Written Communication•2008

  • Speech Genres and Other Late Essays

    Martin Melaver, M M Bakhtin et al.•Poetics Today•1987

Unique citing works15
Citations per year7,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae