Informing research on generative artificial intelligence from a language and literacy perspective
A meta‐synthesis of studies in science education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392879 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kok‐sing Tang (0000-0002-2764-539X, School of Education Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1329-1355 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21875 |
| OpenAlex | W4396220837 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 105 |
Research in languages and literacies in science education (LLSE) has developed substantial theoretical and pedagogical insights into how students learn science through language, discourse, and multimodal representations. At the same time, language is central to the functioning of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). On this common basis concerning the role of language, this paper explores how foundational ideas from LLSE studies can inform the use of GenAI in science education. A bibliometric analysis of 412 journal articles from Web of Science provided the initial step to identify major themes and relationships in the LLSE literature. The analysis revealed four clusters of research in LLSE: reading and writing scientific text, science discourse and interaction, multilingual science classroom, and multimodality and representations. Each cluster was further analyzed through close reading of selected articles to identify and connect key constructs to the potential use of GenAI. These constructs include the interactive‐constructive reading model, text genre, reading‐writing integration, dialogic interaction, critical questioning, argumentation, translanguaging, hybridity, thematic pattern, modal affordance, and transduction. From these ideas and connections, the paper recommends several pedagogical principles for science educators to guide the use of GenAI. It concludes that LLSE research offers valuable insights for researchers and teachers to investigate and design the use of GenAI in science education. In turn, the impending use of GenAI also calls for a rethinking of literacy that will shape future research in LLSE
Affordance · Argumentation theory · Constructive · Dialogic · Generative grammar · Linguistics · Literacy · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Reading (process) · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI-textuality
“Generative AI literacy across education and business
Applying Artificial Intelligence in a Comparative Study of Science Images from Vietnamese and Taiwanese Textbooks
‘This might sound like I’m wearing a tinfoil hat…’ – Knowledge workers’ perceptions of privacy and surveillance in group-based communicative AI
Examining generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in assessing students’ responses to socio-scientific issues in physics
Paper-based or digital tool
Creating adaptive learning pathways for inquiry-based learning in school science using generative AI large language models
Generative AI as the New Frontier in Science Education
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Extended Cognition in Science Learning Contexts
Theorizing AI literacy development using Habermas' three cognitive knowledge interests from a systematic review
Generative Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted STEM Education
Communicating the environment through artificial intelligence
From founding voices to future visions
Investigating High School Students’ Attitudes Toward the Use of AI in Education
Claiming the research expertise on human-GenAI interaction for sociolinguistics
Reading Images
A review of research on metacognition in science education
Examining Science Education in ChatGPT
Chapter 1 Developing Socially Just Subject-Matter Instruction
Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education
Examining the literacy component of science literacy
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy
The Double Invention of Komo
Competing visions of artificial intelligence in education—A heuristic analysis on sociotechnical imaginaries and problematizations in policy guidelines
Exploring high school biology students’ discussions of multi-genre texts
Assessing early primary students’ growth in a science unit using multiple modes of representation
Retracted Article
Textbook and popular science text reading
Supporting Spanish 11th grade students to make scientific writing when learning chemistry in English
The Role of Materiality in an Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Representations of science content in a primary classroom
Scientific argumentation and responsive teaching
Plan‐Draw‐Evaluate (PDE) pattern in students' collaborative drawing
Undergraduate biology students' model‐based reasoning in the laboratory
Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
Acting with epistemic agency
An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts
Can AI be racist? Color‐evasiveness in the application of machine learning to science assessments
Bias, bias everywhere
Can we and should we use artificial intelligence for formative assessment in science
Material inquiry and transformation as prerequisite processes of scientific argumentation
AI and formative assessment
The Work of Language in Multicultural Classrooms
Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis Methodologies
Bilingual education in the 21st century
Articulating communities
Writing in Multimodal Texts
Speech Genres and Other Late Essays
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |