Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making in‐the‐moment learning visible

A framework to identify and compare various ways of learning through continuity and discourse change

Bibliographic Data

ID21392912
AuthorsJessica M Karch (0000-0002-5546-4318, Department of Chemistry Tufts University Medford Massachusetts USA), Nicolette M Maggiore (0000-0001-9098-9569, Department of Chemistry Tufts University Medford Massachusetts USA), Jennifer R Pierre‐Louis (Department of Chemistry Tufts University Medford Massachusetts USA), Destiny Strange (Department of Chemistry Tufts University Medford Massachusetts USA), Vesal Dini (0000-0003-0639-9238, Department of Physics Tufts University Medford Massachusetts USA), Ira Caspari‐Gnann (0000-0003-1728-8656, Department of Chemistry Tufts University Medford Massachusetts USA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume108
Issue5
Pages1292-1328
Publication date2024-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/sce.21874
OpenAlexW4395024682
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited79

Small group interactions and interactions with near‐peer instructors such as learning assistants serve as fertile opportunities for student learning in undergraduate active learning classrooms. To understand what students take away from these interactions, we need to understand how and what they learn during the moment of their interaction. This study builds on practical epistemology analysis to develop a framework to study this in‐the‐moment learning during interactions by operationalizing it through the lens of discourse change and continuity toward three ends. Using video recordings of students and learning assistants interacting in a variety of contexts including remote, in‐person, and hybrid classrooms in introductory chemistry and physics at two universities, we developed an analytical framework that can characterize learning in the moment of interaction, is sensitive to different kinds of learning, and can be used to compare interactions. The framework and its theoretical underpinnings are described in detail. In‐depth examples demonstrate how the framework can be applied to classroom data to identify and differentiate different ways in which in‐the‐moment learning occurs

Epistemology · Mathematics education · Moment (physics) · Operationalization · Physics · Science education · Variety (cybernetics) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology

  • Why Do They Do What They Do? A Model That Describes and Connects the Drivers of Learning Assistant Facilitation Practices

    Open Access•Nicolette M Maggiore, Jessica M Karch et al.•Science Education•2026

  • Aesthetic Experience in Science Education

    Per‐Olof Wickman, Per-Olof Wickman•Aesthetic Experience in Science…•2006

  • Defining sensemaking

    Open Access•Tor Ole B Odden, Rosemary S Russ•Science Education•2019

  • The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse

    Open Access•Philip Scott, Philip H Scott et al.•Science Education•2006

  • Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space

    Open Access•Angela Calabrese Barton, Edna Tan•Journal of Research in Science…•2009

  • When Smart Groups Fail

    Brigid Barron•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2003

  • Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work

    Yrjö Engeström•Ergonomics•2000

  • Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools

    Open Access•Clark A Chinn, Betina A Malhotra•Science Education•2002

  • Learning as discourse change

    Open Access•Per‐Olof Wickman, Leif Östman•Science Education•2002

  • Epistemologies in practice

    Open Access•Leema K Berland, Christina V Schwarz et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2016

  • Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning

    Open Access•Michael Ford, Michael J Ford•Science Education•2008

  • Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math

    Open Access•Elli J Theobald, Mariah J Hill et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement

    Randi A Engle, Faith R Conant•Cognition and Instruction•2002

  • Experience and Education

    John Dewey•Experience and Education•1963

  • Aesthetics, affect, and making meaning in science education

    Open Access•Per‐Olof Wickman, Vaughan Prain et al.•International Journal of Science…•2022

  • Biological Conceptualization of Race

    Open Access•Jun-Ki Lee, Jun‐Ki Lee et al.•Science & Education•2021

  • Sashaying Across Party Lines

    Open Access•Heidi Cian•Review of Research in Education•2021

  • Epistemological messages in a modeling‐based elementary science classroom compared with a traditional classroom

    Open Access•Phil Seok Oh, Heesoo Ha et al.•Science Education•2022

  • Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers

    Open Access•Vesal Dini, Hannah Sevian et al.•Science Education•2020

  • Reframing formative assessment for emergent bilinguals

    Open Access•Edward G Lyon•Science Education•2023

  • The cognitive and affective roles of learning assistants in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics college classrooms

    Open Access•Hagit Kornreich‐Leshem, Rocio Benabentos et al.•Science Education•2022

  • Epistemic agency for costructuring expansive knowledge‐building practices

    Open Access•Jianwei Zhang, Yan Tian et al.•Science Education•2022

  • “Estoy Explorando Science”

    Open Access•Enrique Suarez•Science Education•2020

  • Retiring the term English language learners

    Open Access•María González‐howard, Enrique Suarez•Journal of Research in Science…•2021

  • A transactional methodology for analysing learning

    Open Access•Leif Östman, Johan Öhman•Mind Culture and Activity•2023

  • Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry

    John W Creswell, Dana L Miller•Theory Into Practice•2000

  • Situated Learning

    Open Access•Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger•Situated Learning•1991

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae