Investigating the impact of eliciting and being responsive to students' initial ideas on productive disciplinary engagement across a unit
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21392937 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ron E Gray (0000-0002-0512-063X, Department of STEM Education Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA, corresponding author), Allyson Rogan‐Klyve (Department of Science Education Central Washington University Ellensburg Washington USA), Martha M Canipe (0000-0001-6721-0908, Department of Teaching and Learning Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 312-334 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21701 |
| OpenAlex | W4205409753 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 47 |
In this study, we examined the ways in which two middle school science teachers elicited and were responsive to students' initial science ideas for explaining an anchoring phenomenon while teaching the same model‐based learning unit focused on plate tectonics. Data sources included student models, classroom video, and classroom artifacts. Our analysis revealed a connection between the elicitation of initial ideas, teacher responsiveness to those ideas, and the continued use of those ideas by the students across the unit as evidenced in their individually constructed models. In both classrooms, variation in initial ideas seen on the first day narrowed as students engaged in activities designed to challenge their ideas and present the scientifically accepted explanation of the phenomenon. In one classroom, however, far more ideas were surfaced early, and those ideas were utilized by students as they made sense of the phenomenon. In the other classroom, far fewer ideas were surfaced early and those that were all but disappeared once the unit activities began suggesting student ideas were less likely to be utilized as a sense‐making resource. This study contributes to a growing understanding of the importance of eliciting and responding to students' initial ideas in students' productive disciplinary engagement across an instructional unit
Discipline · Epistemology · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Phenomenon · Resource (disambiguation) · Science education · Social science · Sociology · Student engagement · Unit (ring theory) · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
Computational models as tools for supporting responsive teaching
Talk moves as pedagogical tools for eliciting and working with student ideas in an undergraduate general biology laboratory
Why most definitions of modeling competence in science education fall short
Proposing a Framework to Center Justice in Ambitious Science Teaching
Talking to Strangers About Science
Students' collaborative meaning-making in life skills education
A Case Study of Preservice Science Teachers' Enactment of Co‐Designed Formative Assessment Practices in a Chemistry Laboratory Setting
Mind in Society
Teaching and Its Predicaments
Engaging Science
Extending the use of soil survey information
Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities
Formative Assessment
Epistemologies in practice
Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry
Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement
Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations
Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room
Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions
Making sense of argumentation and explanation
‘Models of’ versus ‘Models for’
Beyond the scientific method
Invoking student resources in whole-class conversations in science education
Truth, success, and faith
Educational Psychology
Science Education in Three-Part Harmony
Scientific Representation
Situated Learning
Epistemic Cultures
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |