Barriers and Back Regions as Opportunity Structures for White-Collar Crime

Bibliographic Data

ID2151908
AuthorsOskar Engdahl (0000-0002-6789-9589, University of Gothenburg, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume30
Issue2
Pages115-143
Publication date2009-01-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDeviant Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0163-9625 • E-ISSN: 1521-0456
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01639620802050148
OpenAlexW2068872041
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited46

Opportunities for crime are a central component in many explanatory models for criminality. In research on white-collar crime, this emerges particularly through emphasis on the importance of social position for the possibility of carrying out crime. This article argues that Goffman's ideas about barriers and back regions should be used to specify how social positions strengthen the opportunities for committing economic crime. The basic insight is that opportunities arise in situations where people by virtue of their positions build up barriers that prevent others from foreseeing and becoming aware of what goes on. An empirical case analysis clarifies the concepts' theoretical content, empirical relevance, and applicability to the research area. Further developments of this approach are discussed in conclusion. This article was written as part of the project "Financial intermediaries and economic crime," funded by the Swedish Research Council (grant no. 421-2002-2764). The author thanks Tage Alalehto, Agneta Bogestad, Bengt Larsson, Sven-Åke Lindgren, Elsebeth Ström, and Lotta Pettersson for their helpful comments on an earlier draft. Notes 1The article treats opportunity structures as independent of other factors such as motives and the question of why an opportunity is exploited. Obviously an opportunity must be identified and be relevant for a person's ambitions in order for him or her to exploit it. This also requires it to be regarded as more suitable in the context than other potential opportunities. See Cressey (Citation1953:77–91), Coleman (Citation1987:410), and Tittle's (1995:205–208) discussions of perception. 2This includes others' possibilities of control. The absence of people who can exercise control and thus constitute "capable guardians" has often been considered, as is well known, to be an essential element in the possibility of committing crime, as has the lack of effective control procedures (Shover and Bryant Citation1995:144). 3In cases involving two or more persons who act together as a team in a back region, one can say in Simmel's terminology that they constitute a "secret society" (Simmel Citation1950:345–376; see also Baker and Faulkner Citation1993: 843). 4A back region is always in relation to a front region, where people are given a certain impression of the individual and his or her actions. The performance itself is the point of reference for the distinction between front and back regions (Goffman Citation1959:114). The performance is understood as "all that activity of an individual which occurs during a period marked by his continuous presence before a particular set of observers and which has some influence on the observers" (Goffman Citation1959:22). 5One can also, of course, supplement the typology with the various sorts of barriers that exist when laws and ordinances are established and changed, which was the chief concern of Bachrach and Baratz. 6The broker's modus operandi was essentially the same as in the case of Nick Leeson and Barings Bank. 7A question-mark account is used by brokerage firms for temporary placement of deals. These may be deals that belong to clients who have not yet obtained a personal account, or deals made for clients where it is unclear exactly which account the client wants to book the deal in, or minor deals that are steps in a major deal that is to be booked on the client only when the entire deal is completed. The idea was that the deals would be on this account only briefly, usually for at most a day. Additional informationNotes on contributorsOskar Engdahl OSKAR ENGDAHL is in the faculty of the Department of Sociology at Göteborg University. His doctoral dissertation dealt with the development of financial offshore markets and economic crime (2003). Currently, he is working on the role of financial intermediation in economic crime

Collar · Criminology · Forensic engineering · Structural engineering · White (mutation · White-collar crime · Chemistry · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Engineering · Psychology · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses