Anxiety buffers and the threat of extreme automation
A terror management theory perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21596166 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frank Goethals (0000-0003-0045-5665, Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion), Jennifer L Ziegelmayer (0000-0002-9674-6557, Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 96-118 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Information Technology and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-3845 • E-ISSN: 1758-5813 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/itp-06-2019-0304 |
| OpenAlex | W3118280981 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 49 |
Purpose The advent of extreme automation from new technologies such as artificial intelligence portends a massive increase in unemployment. The psychological impact of this threat on the workforce is critically important. This paper aims to examine the functioning of individuals' anxiety buffers in response to this threat. Design/methodology/approach A two-stage mixed-methods design is used. In stage 1, qualitative data are gathered through semi-structured interviews. In stage 2, quantitative data are collected through two experiments to assess the psychological impact of exposure to the threat. Findings Exposure to the threat of extreme automation reduces self-esteem, faith in the worldview and attachment security. When self-esteem and attachment security are under attack, they are ineffective as anxiety buffers, and anxiety levels increase. Additionally, there is a distal effect such that during a period of distraction, the threatened anxiety buffers are reinforced and return to their normal levels. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to a homogenous culture in which work is highly salient. Future research should include other cultures, other methods of exposure and further examine the distal effects. Originality/value The study examines the previously underexplored issue of individuals' psychological response to the impending changes in the workforce because of technological advancements
Anxiety · Economic growth · Economics · Originality · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Workforce · Applied Psychology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Psychology · Social Psychology
Organization-Based Self-Esteem
Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications
A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior
Thirty Years of Terror Management Theory
The Existential Function of Close Relationships
Avoidance of Information Technology Threats
Job Insecurity
Do Moderators of the Optimistic Bias Affect Personal or Target Risk Estimates? A Review of the Literature
Terror Management Theory
The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Building and Testing Behavioral Causal Theory
Two Structural Equation Models
Two Structural Equation Models
The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem
The future of employment
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1
Computer availability, computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers
Privacy cynicism
A privacy paradox
A theoretical and empirical review of the death-thought accessibility concept in terror management research
You’re Fired,” Says the Robot
Putting the fear back into fear appeals
Fear control and danger control
Technophobia
The definition of self
Evidence for the DTA hypothesis II
Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples
If it changes it must be a process
Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience
A stitch in time
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |