Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

We need world-wide corpus-based typology

A parallel corpus study of restrictives ('only')

Bibliographic Data

ID21608271
AuthorsBernhard Wälchli (0000-0002-0256-6855, Stockholm University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume79
Pages69-157
Publication date2024-03-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTravaux neuchâtelois de linguistique (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1010-1705 • E-ISSN: 2504-205X
PublisherCantonal and University Library Fribourg (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.26034/ne.tranel.2024.4824
OpenAlexW4392795703
LanguageEN
References cited15

Language is a tool for communication in concrete use and there are several thousand languages; hence, approaches that are both corpus-linguistically and typologically informed must play an important role in linguistics. This is demonstrated in an investigation of the generally expressed meaning (GEM) 'only', considered here in translations of the New Testament. It is shown that restrictives are universal (are attested in all 121 languages of a stratified sample from 121 language families and isolates), that the generally expressed meaning (GEM) 'only' differs considerably from the parochially expressed meaning (PEM) of English only, that restriction plays an important role in discourse and that the use of restrictives exhibits hemispheric differences with the Pacific and the Afro-Eurasian linguistic hemispheres reflecting partly different usage patterns. It is argued that these differences are deeply rooted in discourse (parole) rather than grammar and lexicon (langue) and are so common in discourse that they percolate to written Bible translations

Archaeology · Corpus linguistics · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Typology · Computer Science · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · linguistics and terminology studies · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Philosophy

  • Typology and Universals

    Open Access•William Croft•Typology and Universals•2002

  • Rhetorical Structure Theory

    William C Mann, Scott A Thompson et al.•Third Text•1988

  • The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax

    Martin Haspelmath•Folia Linguistica•2011

  • Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time

    J Nichols•Linguistic Diversity in Space and…•1992

  • Corpus-based typology

    Open Access•Natalia Levshina•Linguistic Typology•2022

  • The interplay of contrast markers (‘but’), selectives (“topic markers”) and word order in the fuzzy oppositive contrast domain

    Open Access•Bernhard Wälchli•Linguistic Typology•2024

  • The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World

    Joan L Bybee, Joan Bybee et al.•Studies in Language•1989

  • Only and Focus in Imbabura Quichua

    Open Access•Jos Tellings•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•2014

  • Selectives (“topic markers”) on subordinate clauses

    Open Access•Bernhard Wälchli•Linguistics•2022

  • The meanings of focus

    Open Access•Dejan Matić, Daniel Wedgwood•Journal of Linguistics•2012

  • Mirativity

    Open Access•Scott Delancey•Linguistic Typology•1997

  • Appositive possession in Ainu and around the Pacific

    Open Access•Anna Bugaeva, J Nichols et al.•Linguistic Typology•2021

  • Lexical typology through similarity semantics

    Open Access•Bernhard Wälchli, Michael Cysouw•Linguistics•2012

  • Contrast and Information Structure

    Open Access•Carla Umbach•Linguistics•2005

  • Areal pragmatics of New Guinea

    Open Access•Lourens De Vries•Journal of Pragmatics•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae