Peace in the shadow of conflict
Exploring the potential of constructive language strategies in Israel–Hamas relations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21620173 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Goddy Uwa Osimen (0000-0001-8294-6163, Covenant University Department of Political Science and International Relations, , Ota), Moyosoluwa Dele-Dada (0000-0002-2184-3248, Covenant University Department of Political Science and International Relations, , Ota), Felix Chidozie (0000-0002-2187-9187, Covenant University Department of Political Science and International Relations, , Ota), Nkem Janefrances Osere (0009-0009-3553-3038, Covenant University), Nkem Osere (Covenant University Department of Mass Communication, , Ota) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 297-315 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Conflict Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1044-4068 • E-ISSN: 1758-8545 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/ijcma-05-2025-0158 |
| OpenAlex | W4415696452 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 41 |
Purpose This study aims to explore the potential of constructive language strategies in transforming and creating open avenues for sustainable peacebuilding amid ideological rigidity and cycles of retaliatory violence. Design/methodology/approach Using critical discourse analysis grounded in the theory of linguistic relativity, moral disengagement, structural violence and epistemic injustice, this study analyses 75 purposively sampled texts, including official statements, media reports and grassroots communications. The analysis is structured across textual, discursive and sociocultural levels, with coding conducted through NVivo 12. Findings The findings demonstrate that language is not merely a reflection of conflict but a powerful tool in shaping it. Dehumanising, moralising and binary narratives dominate official discourse from both parties, sustaining hostilities and limiting the discursive space for peace. Practical implications Constructive communication strategies, particularly in ceasefire negotiations, education and media reporting, can lower emotional intensity, challenge adversarial narratives and foster environments conducive to dialogue and reconciliation. Originality/value This research moves beyond traditional analyses of military and political strategies to offer a discourse-centred perspective on peacebuilding, revealing both the potential and limitations of language as a transformative tool in asymmetric conflicts
Constructive · Critical discourse analysis · Distancing · Ideology · Narrative · Negotiation · Politics · Transformative learning · Health and Conflict Studies · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Middle East Politics and Society
The Clash of Civilizations?
Hamas and Palestine
Peace by Peaceful Means
Media and the Path to Peace
Dehumanization
The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes
The Parents Circle-Families Forum – Israeli Palestinian bereaved families for peace
Mitigating structural violence through legislative oversight
Victimhood in the Face of Media Ideological Battle
Hamas and the Media
The Moral Imagination
Social Cognitive Theory
The role of the media in violent conflicts in the digital age
The misconstruction of enemy images in war reporting
Just war, human shields, and the 2023–24 Gaza War
Sustainable development goals implementation in a post‐colonial African State
Discursive legitimation strategies
From jihad to resistance
How Social Media Is Changing Conflict
Esprit de Corpse
Rethinking the Role of Religion in Arab Antisemitic Discourses
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |