Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attitudes Toward Spay/Neuter in the US Population

Urban/Rural, Cat/Dog, and Demographic Differences

Bibliographic Data

ID2162247
AuthorsCarol L Glasser, Carol Glasser (0000-0002-8700-6565, Minnesota State University, Mankato, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume34
Issue1
Pages93-107
Publication date2021-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnthrozoös (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0892-7936 • E-ISSN: 1753-0377
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08927936.2021.1874112
OpenAlexW3127382710
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited16

An online survey of 991 US adults examines differences in attitudes among the general US population toward spaying and neutering cats and dogs, with a focus on differences between urban and rural respondents and the influence of demographic characteristics. While current literature focuses on sterilization behaviors of guardians, this study will contribute to a better understanding of attitudes in the general population. Twelve items measure attitudes toward spay/neuter. Each item is analyzed with a separate multiple regression to understand urban–rural, cat–dog and demographic differences in attitudes. Results indicate fewer urban–rural and cat–dog differences than expected, though rural respondents are less likely to find the practice cruel, think animals should have a litter before sterilization, or support laws to require sterilization. People asked about dogs are more likely to agree that spay/neuter operations are expensive but are less likely to believe it “is the right thing to do” than those asked about cats. The most prevalent characteristics impacting attitudes are guardianship, age, and gender. Guardians are more likely to attribute positive health and behavioral outcomes to sterilization and feel that it is morally and socially positive. Compared with baby boomers, the Millennial generation (18–34) and Generation X (35–54) have less knowledge of sterilization and more concerns about its safety. Millennials are also less likely to find sterilization to be morally and socially positive. Women showed more support than men overall for sterilization as morally and socially positive and are more accepting of social and political management of sterilization. Overall, these findings highlight social support for spay/neuter, though less support for managing it with political intervention such as laws

Business · CATS · Legal guardian · Neutering · Political science · Population · Sociology · Sterilization (economics · Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies · Demography · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • “Common Bonds” and the human-animal bond – exploring social, emotional and moral growth in incarcerated youth working with shelter dogs through the lens of the One Welfare model

    Keri B Burchfield, Keri Burchfield et al.•Contemporary Justice Review•2026

  • The 21st Century Rabbit Paradox”

    Carol L Glasser, Carol Glasser•Society and Animals•2022

  • Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions

    Harold A Herzog•Anthrozoös•2007

  • The Animal-Human Bond and Ethnic Diversity

    Christina Risley-Curtiss, Lynn C Holley et al.•Social Work•2006

  • A Survey of Dog Populations in Urban and Rural Areas of Yucatan, Mexico

    Antonio Ortega-Pacheco, Antonio Ortega‐pacheco et al.•Anthrozoös•2007

  • Attitudes and actions of West Indian dog owners towards neutering their animals

    William J Fielding, Denise Samuels et al.•Anthrozoös•2002

  • Public Concern with Animal Well-Being

    Open Access•Holli A Kendall, L Lobao et al.•Rural Sociology•2006

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae