Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nonoverlapping Magisteria Versus Science-Religion Integration

Rereading Stephen Jay Gould

Bibliographic Data

ID21725444
AuthorsSamuli Helama (0000-0002-9777-3354, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume22
Issue2
Pages393-406
Publication date2024-04-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheology and Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1474-6700 • E-ISSN: 1474-6719
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14746700.2024.2351648
OpenAlexW4398349726
LanguageEN

The principle of nonoverlapping magisteria (NOMA), by Stephen Jay Gould, is commonly cited in the science-religion literature as an archetype of a model separating the domains of science and religion. As such, NOMA represents the independence category in Ian Barbour’s science-religion typology. However, it is commonly neglected that NOMA also permits dialogue and even integration of scientific and religious inputs at the personal level, i.e. beyond the level of magisteria. To distinguish the two levels, it is essential to note that Gould considered the magisteria not as any kind of domain but closely related to teaching authorities

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Theology · Evolution and Science Education · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae