Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public preferences and decision-making for mpox vaccination in the African region

A multinational discrete choice experiment

Bibliographic Data

ID21879596
AuthorsMin Du (0000-0001-9953-0359, Peking University), Jie Deng (0000-0001-6896-8622, Peking University), Wenxin Yan (0000-0003-2725-9840, Tsinghua University), Shimo Zhang (Peking University), Shunzhe Wu (Peking University), Min Liu (0000-0002-6622-5486, Peking University), Wannian Liang (0000-0003-1764-5502, Tsinghua University), Jue Liu (0000-0002-1938-9365, Peking University)
Year2026
Volume11
Issue1
Pagese018942
Publication date2026-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2025-018942
PMID41494799
OpenAlexW7118440565
LanguageEN
References cited27

INTRODUCTION: After the WHO prequalified the first vaccine against mpox, we aimed to identify the influence of vaccine attributes on mpox vaccination preferences among the African adults. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among 1832 African adults across six countries. Respondents answered eight questions, each requiring them to choose between two hypothetical vaccines, with variations in distance from home to vaccination facilities, cost, effectiveness, duration of the protective effect, supply and side effects. A mixed logit model was employed to estimate vaccination preferences. Willingness to pay and changes in probability were also estimated from the regression coefficients. RESULTS: The strongest vaccine attribute was the higher effectiveness of vaccines (≥90% vs <60%: b=1.196, 95% CI 1.089 to 1.303), then followed by a longer duration of protective effect (lifetime vs <6 months: b=1.053, 95% CI 0.920 to 1.186), a low risk of side effects (<30% vs ≥30%: b=0.495, 95% CI 0.427 to 0.562) and sufficient vaccine supply (sufficient vs limited: b=0.417, 95% CI 0.360 to 0.475). Although compared with a walking distance of 60 min, a walking distance of 45 min was significant (b=0.402, 95% CI 0.296 to 0.508), there was no significant difference for walking distance at 15 and 30 min. Scenario prediction analysis showed that higher vaccine effectiveness (≥90%: 53.55%; 80%-89.99%: 51.41%; 60%-79.99%: 25.85%), a longer duration of protective effect (lifetime: 48.28%; 12-36 months: 25.51%; 6-11 months: 14.39%), lower vaccine costs (US$0: 28.10%; US$20: 25.42%; US$100: 14.34%), a risk of side effects of less than 30% (24.24%) and sufficient vaccine supply (20.57%) all increased the probability of vaccine uptake. Populations living with children preferred vaccines with sufficient supply and lower cost, compared with those living without children. INTERPRETATION: In Africa, alongside providing more reliable mpox vaccines, offering sufficient vaccine free of charge, particularly to those living with children, would encourage higher vaccine uptake

Multinational corporation · Preference · Public choice · Public health · Public health policy · Vaccination · Immune responses and vaccinations · Poxvirus research and outbreaks · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Health Policy

  • Latent Class Analysis and Finite Mixture Modeling

    Katherine E Masyn•Quantitative Methods Vol. 2•2013

  • Fitting Mixed Logit Models by Using Maximum Simulated Likelihood

    Open Access•Arne R Hole•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2007

  • Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist

    Open Access•John F P Bridges, A Brett Hauber et al.•Value in Health•2011

  • Crucial choices in a global health crisis

    Open Access•Bach Xuan Tran, Anh Linh et al.•Journal of Global Health•2023

  • A cross-sectional survey of public knowledge of the monkeypox disease in Nigeria

    Open Access•Ahmad I Al-Mustapha, Oluwaseun Adeolu Ogundijo et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae