Reversing the trend

A scoping review of health innovation transfer or exchange from low- and middle-income countries to high-income countries

Bibliographic Data

ID21881043
AuthorsSage Marie Consolatrice Ishimwe (0000-0001-9928-5891, University of Global Health Equity, corresponding author), Jepchirchir Kiplagat (0000-0002-7836-2138, AMPATH), Arina Kadam Knowlton (0000-0002-3180-0022, National Institutes of Health), Alicia A Livinski (0000-0002-7201-3500, National Institutes of Health), Linda E Kupfer (0000-0002-6886-6818, National Institutes of Health)
Year2023
Volume8
IssueSuppl 7
Pagese013583
Publication date2023-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013583
PMID37967892
OpenAlexW4388693786
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited32

The transfer of innovations from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to high-income countries (HICs) has received little attention, leaving gaps in the understanding of the process, its benefits and the factors influencing it. This scoping review, part of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) project and the focus for a 2022 NIH-sponsored workshop on Global Health Reciprocal Innovation, sought to identify publications describing health innovations that were researched, developed and implemented in LMICs and adapted to address similar health challenges in HICs. A protocol was written a priori and registered on Open Science Framework. Four databases were searched for articles published in English from 2000 to 2022 and described health innovations developed in LMICs and were transferred to HICs. Using Covidence, two reviewers initially screened the title and abstract and then the full text; discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Two reviewers collected the data from each article using Covidence and Microsoft Excel; discrepancies were resolved by a separate third reviewer. 7191 records were retrieved and screened of which 12 studies were included. Various frameworks and methodologies were employed in these studies, with a particular emphasis on adaptation and adoption of innovations. The review uncovered different paradigms of LMIC to HIC innovation transfer and exchange, including unidirectional transfers from LMICs to HICs as well as bidirectional or multidirectional mutually beneficial exchanges. The use of both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods was common across all the included articles. Facilitators for innovation transfers included stakeholder engagement, relevance of local context, simplicity, and sufficient funding, promotion and branding. Barriers to transfers were mostly the opposite of the facilitators. Our results highlighted the underexplored field of LMIC to HIC innovation transfer and exchange and lay the foundation for future research studies

Business · Political science · Public relations · Stakeholder · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Global Health and Surgery · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Medicine