Strengthening equitable research capacity in response to infectious diseases of poverty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21881571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emmanuel Asampong (0000-0002-1926-1118, University of Ghana), Maria Isabel Echavarria Mejia (Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas), Yodi Mahendradhata (0000-0002-4522-1785, Universitas Gadjah Mada), Mahnaz Vahedi (World Health Organization), Anna Thorson (0000-0002-8703-6561, UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland), Anna M Thorson (World Health Organization) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | e023520 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | BMJ Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2026-023520 |
| PMID | 41856655 |
| OpenAlex | W7138970557 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 14 |
The inequitable global distribution of resources for research parallels the unequal global distribution of morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases. Significant gaps in research capacity prevail, and equitable and accessible opportunities for research remain a priority. We argue for the democratisation of research: without equitable participation in, and ownership of, research, by those who are implementing the research or are part of the communities being researched, contextualised research needs and health system bottlenecks will remain unresolved. This perpetuates an inequitable power balance related to research and innovation. Equitable research capacity is fundamental to tackling global health challenges and reducing health inequity. We emphasise the evolution from externally driven, high-income-centric models of research capacity strengthening towards inclusive, context-sensitive approaches that prioritise local ownership, diversity and sustainability. A paradigm shift from ‘imposing technical support’ to ‘fostering ownership of knowledge’ has catalysed new models of engagement, such as implementation research capacity among health professionals and communities, and regionally anchored postgraduate training. Institutionalised, inclusive research can align with national priorities and yield measurable improvements in health outcomes. However, persistent inequities rooted in gender, geography and institutional hierarchies continue to constrain participation and impact. Addressing these requires deliberate strategies to democratise access, diversify partnerships and support under-represented institutions and individuals. Allowing dynamic roles in long-term partnerships and regional networks on a continuum between academic partners and capacity-strengthening recipients can support mitigation of intersectional inequities and lead to capacity strengthening
Capacity building · Global health · Health equity · Health services research · Inequality · Parallels · Poverty · Global Health and Surgery · Global Maternal and Child Health · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Networks, Crowds, and Markets
Decolonising global health
Impacts of tuberculosis services strengthening and the Covid-19 pandemic on case detection and treatment outcomes in Mimika District, Papua, Indonesia
Barriers to Applying Knowledge Gained Through an Implementation Research Massive Open Online Course
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |