Public Design of Urban Sprawl

Governments and the Extension of the Urban Fabric in Flanders and the Netherlands

Bibliographic Data

ID22018290
AuthorsEdwin Buitelaar (0000-0002-0558-6165, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency), Hans Leinfelder (0000-0002-6159-3300, KU Leuven)
Year2020
Volume5
Issue1
Pages46-57
Publication date2020-03-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-7635 • E-ISSN: 2183-7635
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/up.v5i1.2669
OpenAlexW3009416822
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited36

Urban sprawl is often portrayed as a (quasi-)natural process, as inevitable and taking place behind our backs. However, we claim that it is co-produced by government: Governments not only allow sprawl to happen, but often also incentivise and stimulate it, either knowingly or unintentionally. We substantiate this claim by comparing urban development and government institutions in Flanders (Belgium) to the Netherlands, two neighbouring territories, yet very different regarding this matter. Urban development in the Netherlands is considered orderly and compact, whereas in Flanders it is considered haphazard and sprawled. Urban planning, too, could not be more different. Strong national planning and an active local land policy characterise Dutch planning, while the opposite applies to Flanders. Although these images seem largely accurate, we argue that it is very particular government institutions in both countries that (help) create and reproduce the various degrees of urban sprawl

Civil engineering · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Land use · Land-use planning · Political science · Urban planning · Urban sprawl · Engineering · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Rural development and sustainability · Urbanization and City Planning