Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Practical considerations of implementing disaster crisis standards of care in the intensive care unit

A scoping review

Bibliographic Data

ID22025687
AuthorsDavid Sellers (0000-0001-6838-1354, Griffith University, corresponding author), Lynda Hughes (0000-0002-4776-5065, Griffith University), Julia Crilly (0000-0002-1455-8983, Griffith University), Jamie Ranse (0000-0002-5265-6365, Griffith University)
Year2024
Volume105
Pages104412
Publication date2024-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2212-4209
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104412
OpenAlexW4392875619
LanguageEN
References cited36

Disasters have the potential to cause a surge of patients, some of which may require admission to an intensive care unit. Due to the high resource requirements of intensive care units, standards of care may need to be altered during a disaster to treat more people with limited resources, a care model referred to as ‘crisis standards of care’. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the practical considerations of implementing crisis standards of care in intensive care units during patient surges resulting from disasters. Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, most of the 19 studies included in this review were qualitative in design, undertaken in developed countries and focused on COVID-19. Adequate space, human resources, and physical resources were required for standard patient care in ICUs. When unbalanced, contingency measures or crisis standards of care were implemented, and adjustment to ICU governance was required. During times of crisis standards of care implementation, healthcare practitioner wellbeing was impacted. Continued efforts to support the ICU workforce before, during and after a disaster are warranted

Business · Intensive care medicine · Intensive care unit · Medical emergency · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Engineering · Medicine · Psychology · Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Assessing public health emergency preparedness

    Open Access•Scott Chiossi, Svetla Tsolova et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2021

  • Ethical Guidance for Disaster Response, Specifically Around Crisis Standards of Care

    Jonathon P Leider, Debra DeBruin et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae