Anatomy of disaster recoveries
Tangible and intangible short-term recovery dynamics following the 2015 Nepal earthquakes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22026976 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremy Spoon (Portland State University, corresponding author), Chelsea E Hunter (0000-0003-2144-4690, The Ohio State University), D Gerkey (0000-0003-3254-649X, Oregon State University), Ram B Chhetri (Tribhuvan University), Alisa Rai (0000-0002-3528-7019, Portland State University), Umesh Basnet (0000-0002-4964-2296, Portland State University), Anudeep Dewan (0000-0003-2132-3020, University of British Columbia) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Pages | 101879 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2212-4209 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101879 |
| OpenAlex | W3085165511 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 94 |
The April/May 2015 Nepal earthquakes and aftershocks had catastrophic impacts on rural households living in biophysical extremes. Recoveries from natural hazards that become disasters have tangible and intangible short- and long-term dynamics, which require linked quantitative and qualitative methods to understand. With these premises in mind, we randomly selected 400 households in two accessible and two inaccessible settlements across two of the highest impacted districts to assess variation in household and settlement recoveries through tangible impacts to infrastructure and livelihood and intangible impacts to place attachment and mental well-being. We conducted household surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus groups over two ten-week intervals at 9 months and 1.5 years after the earthquakes and returned at 2.5 years to share and contextualize results. Previously, we used non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination to illustrate associations among recovery indicators, demographics, and adaptive capacity domains composed of multiple variables. Results indicated that socio-economic status, hazard exposure, livelihood, and displacement influenced recovery outcomes the most. Here, we triangulate and broaden those findings with 797 surveys, 40 interviews, eight focus groups, and eight research return workshops to illustrate the tangible and intangible dynamics of short-term recoveries through three interconnected and multi-faceted thematic sections: 1) inequality; 2) hazards, livelihood, and displacement; and 3) place, uncertainty, and mental well-being. Our contributions include: 1) providing a linked quantitative and qualitative dataset with a random sample collected at two short-term post-disaster time intervals; 2) illustrating how inequalities shape tangible and intangible recovery dynamics; and 3) documenting linkages between recovery and nascent transformations
Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Focus group · Geography · Hazard · Human settlement · Livelihood · Natural hazard · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Environmental Science · Ecology · Marketing
This Is the End
Contextualizing patterns in short-term disaster recoveries from the 2015 Nepal earthquakes
Rahat-Sahayog (relief support)
“Have a kit, make a plan, and be informed”
Impacts of village fund on post disaster economic recovery in rural Aceh Indonesia
Navigating relief to recovery in humanitarian shelter and settlements
Factors influencing return migration after disaster relocation
Complementing expertise
Navigating multidimensional household recoveries following the 2015 Nepal earthquakes
Cultural assets as catalysts for community-led urban revitalization
Circular resettlement and ongoing risk
A History of Nepal
A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries
Adaptation and transformation
Disaster and Recovery
An Exploratory Framework for the Empirical Measurement of Resilience
The impact of uncertainty and communal coping on mental health following natural disasters
From Poverty to Disaster and Back
Urban resilience efforts must consider social and political forces
Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
Endurance or decline of emergent groups following a flood disaster
Transition of post-disaster housing of rural households
Community‐led reconstruction, social inclusion and participation in post‐earthquake Nepal
Sustainable Disaster Recovery
Social Network Analysis of Disaster Response, Recovery, and Adaptation
A critique of the use of triangulation in social research
Disaster Governance
Strangers on Their Own Land
Twice Removed
How to Remember
Considering Vulnerability in Disaster Risk Reduction Plans
The mental health costs of human displacement
Disaster upon Disaster
A characterisation of the methodology of qualitative research on the nature of perceived risk
Social capital in a crisis
Situating local stakeholders within national disaster governance structures
Mitigation Planning
Postdisaster Social Work
Identifying local needs for post-disaster recovery in Nepal
Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in Poverty Analysis
Navigating multidimensional household recoveries following the 2015 Nepal earthquakes
Adding Value to Randomization with Qualitative Analysis
An evaluation framework for earthquake-responsive land administration
Indigenous Health and Climate Change
Community identity and collective efficacy
Resilience and Sustainable Development
Disruption and recovery of intangible resources during environmental crises
Procedural Vulnerability and Institutional Capacity Deficits in Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction
Recovery and adaptation after the 2015 Nepal earthquakes
Disaster response and recovery
Resilience
Museums of themselves
Trust Shaken
Global environmental change II
That was the Last Time I Saw my House
Resources and Population
Resilience and responsibility
Himalayan Households
Positioning resilience for 2015
Disaster Financialization
Resilience to What? Resilience for Whom
The Martyred City
Linking well-being with cultural revitalization for greater cognitive justice in conservation
Social constraints in cross-boundary collaborative deer management
Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social Research in Human Geography-An Impossible Mixture
The impact of humanitarian assistance on post-disaster social vulnerabilities
Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction
Ethnicity, politics and inequality
Catastrophe and Culture
The Work of Disaster
Integrating quantitative and qualitative research
Adolescents' perspectives on the psychological effects of natural disasters in China and Nepal
Disaster risk reduction and applied anthropology
Considering culture in disaster practice
The question of culture continuity and change after disaster
Disaster vulnerability in anthropological perspective
Chronic disaster syndrome
An Anthropology of Structural Violence
Disaster as Opportunity? Cyclone Pam and the Transmission of Cultural Heritage
An Ecological Risk Management and Capacity Building Model
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |