Effectiveness of stigma reduction interventions and outbreak response adaptations in infectious disease outbreaks
A systematic review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22067454 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amy Paterson (0000-0001-7862-8971, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Ruan Spies (0000-0002-8303-2176, University of Oxford), Chambrez-Zita Zauchenberger (University of Oxford), Ashleigh Cheyne (0000-0002-2400-8969, University of Oxford), Piero L Olliaro (University of Oxford), Amanda Rojek (0000-0002-3948-0756, University of Oxford) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 1755092-1755092 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1755092 |
| PMID | 41710305 |
| OpenAlex | W7127351823 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
Introduction: Stigma is a common and recurring feature of infectious disease outbreaks where it may have detrimental effects on individual wellbeing and undermine outbreak response. This systematic review explores stigma reduction interventions in infectious disease outbreaks. Methods: Eligible studies were searched for in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Global Health databases and through reference screening. Risk of bias was assessed using study design-specific tools and the results of included studies underwent narrative synthesis. Results: Eleven studies conducted across coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Ebola disease, mpox, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and a hypothetical infectious-disease scenario, met the inclusion criteria. Five studies reported reductions in stigma, four reported mixed or null results, and two reported increases in stigma. The most promising strategies for outbreak-related stigma reduction were embedding anti-stigma messaging within health communication, providing psychosocial support, and fostering genuinely participatory community involvement. Discussion: Evidence on how to effectively reduce stigma during outbreaks remains limited. Strengthening the theoretical foundations, measurement tools, and evaluation designs of stigma-reduction interventions will be essential to inform evidence-based outbreak preparedness and response policies. This would help decision-makers ensure that risk communication, community engagement, and service delivery minimise stigma and improve uptake of testing, care, and preventive measures
Disease · Outbreak · Preparedness · Psychological intervention · Social stigma · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework
The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health
How Do We Balance Tensions Between Covid-19 Public Health Responses and Stigma Mitigation? Learning from HIV Research
Fear and Stigma
Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Addressing stigma in infectious disease outbreaks
Ebola Virus Disease Sensitization
Can a brief session of the online coronavirus disease 2019 destigmatization program reduce stigma among survivors? A randomized controlled trial
Severe Anxiety and PTSD Symptoms Among Ebola Virus Disease Survivors and Healthcare Workers in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Eastern DR Congo
Community led health promotion to counter stigma and increase trust amongst priority populations
Social Contact Theory
An Experimental Test of Stigma Communication Content with a Hypothetical Infectious Disease Alert
The Sars-Associated Stigma of Sars Victims in the Post-Sars Era of Hong Kong
Stigma and misconceptions in the time of the Covid-19 pandemic
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |