Designing context-specific implementation strategies to improve water, sanitation, and hygiene in urban low-income settlements in Nigeria
Outcome of stakeholders' collaborative approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22073825 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Uchenna Ezenwaka (0000-0002-6792-2814, University of Nigeria, corresponding author), Iheomimichineke Ojiakor (0009-0003-6809-2407, University of Nigeria), Chinyere Cecilia Okeke (0000-0002-2599-537X, University of Nigeria), Chinyere Okeke (University of Nigeria), Kenechukwu Lawrence Ikeako (University of Nigeria), Kenechukwu Ikeako (University of Nigeria), Joseph Nwankwo (University of Nigeria), Wilson Anyanebechi (University of Nigeria), Wilson Chidubem Anyanebechi (University of Nigeria), Helen Elsey (0000-0003-4724-0581, Hull York Medical School), Obinna Onwujekwe (0000-0002-1214-4285, University of Nigeria) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 1742248-1742248 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1742248 |
| PMID | 41869599 |
| OpenAlex | W7133805521 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 33 |
Background: Urban low-income settlements in Nigeria face significant challenges in accessing Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) services, exacerbating health disparities and poverty. Collaborating to design effective and sustainable solutions is crucial for improving WASH outcomes. This study aims to present the process and outcomes of co-designing context-specific implementation strategies of WASH interventions in urban low-income settlements in Anambra State, Nigeria. Methods: The study employed a stakeholder-driven co-design process involving community members, researchers, and policymakers from both health and non-health sectors to develop context-specific implementation strategies for WASH interventions. Four workshops, fifteen in-depth interviews, and one FGD were conducted with these stakeholders. Outputs from the workshops and interviews were analyzed based on the Proctor implementation strategies framework. Results: Seventeen WASH interventions focusing on health education, advocacy, capacity building, and community-led activities were identified. Their key implementation strategies included the definition of each intervention, the actors that will be involved in the implementation, targets, actions, temporality, dose, and the implementation research outcome (IRO) measurements. Prioritization results informed the co-design of implementation strategies of top-prioritized WASH interventions. Stakeholders perceived the developed strategies as highly acceptable, feasible, and relevant to the community's needs. They believed that these would be adopted by end-users and have the potential to make an impact in their community when implemented due to the cultural appropriateness and potential to address specific community challenges. Enablers of the process included strong community participation, inclusion of diverse and experienced stakeholders, and use of local evidence in decision-making. Stakeholder management, including identifying and engaging appropriate individuals, coordinating schedules, and managing time demands, posed significant challenges. Key lessons learned indicate that leveraging informal networks, adapting local evidence approaches, and cultural sensitivity are crucial in designing interventions and navigating success. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of a collaborative approach in designing effective and sustainable implementation strategies of WASH interventions for urban low-income settlements toward the achievement of SDGs 3 and 6. The findings underscore the need to integrate collaborative and context-specific approaches into WASH policy and programming
Community engagement · Human settlement · Hygiene · Psychological intervention · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability · Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Implementation strategies
The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management
Republished research: Implementation research: what it is and how to do it
Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes
Theory of Change
The Integrated Behavioural Model for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Effect of Contextualized Versus Non-Contextualized Interventions for Improving Hand Washing, Sanitation, and Health in Rural Tanzania
Collaborating to co-produce strategies for delivering adolescent sexual and reproductive health interventions
Improving health through multisectoral collaboration
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Planning and Implementation of Government Strategy for Projects in the Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism, South Africa
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |