Confronting the economic burden of diabetes
Can TCM DRG payment reform in China offer a viable solution? Insights from empirical research in Western China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22077484 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mengen Chen (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine), Meng-en Chen (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine), Haojia Hou (Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Jingyu Yang (0000-0002-7521-7920, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Fanxin Kong (Health Commission of Anhui Province), Tianzhen Cong (Jining Medical University), Qian Zhang (0009-0004-3866-2007, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 1792742-1792742 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1792742 |
| PMID | 41908772 |
| OpenAlex | W7135140679 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Background Diabetes poses a major global public health challenge, carrying significant economic implications worldwide. In China, the ongoing implementation of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) payment reforms, especially within Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) contexts, is critical in improving diabetes patient care and alleviating associated economic burdens. Methods We examined 2,804 hospitalized diabetes patients at Qingyang City Hospital of Chinese Medicine in Gansu Province from 2017 to 2022. Using univariate and interrupted time-series (ITS) analyses, we compared patient visit data, healthcare-related costs, and length of stay pre- and post-DRG reform. Results Following DRG reform at Qingyang City Hospital of Chinese Medicine, significant differences were noted in patients’ age, visit times, type of diabetes, complications and comorbidities, use of Chinese medicine diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, and surgeries and operations, compared with the pre-reform period ( p 0.05). Additionally, there was a slight reduction in length of stay after the reform, although this change did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05). Conclusion DRG reform significantly reduces hospitalization cost, TCM treatment cost, and Western medicine cost for diabetes patients in TCM hospitals. However, its impact on Chinese medicine cost and length of stay is limited. Future reforms should capitalize on the unique strengths of TCM treatment, enhance cost management strategies, and focus on minimizing length of stay and medical expenses while ensuring effective patient care
Acute medicine · China · Economic cost · Health care · MEDLINE · Payment · Public health · Traditional Chinese medicine · Western medicine · Berberine and alkaloids research · Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis · Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045
Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes in China, 2013-2018
Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050
Influencing factors of hospitalization cost of hypertension patients in traditional Chinese medicine hospitals
How does DRG reform affect length of stay and hospitalization costs in traditional Chinese medicine hospitals?—an empirical analysis using interrupted time-series model from two cities in western China
The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization
Diabetes in Argentina
Factors Influencing Hospitalization Cost for Diabetic Patients in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals in Qingyang City, China
The impact of an innovative payment method on medical expenditure, efficiency, and quality for inpatients with different types of medical insurance
The role of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetes
Yi-Shen-Hua-Shi granule ameliorates diabetic kidney disease by the “gut-kidney axis”
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |