Assessing frailty in older adults

Discriminative properties of physical activity questionnaires

Bibliographic Data

ID22077611
AuthorsMert Doğan (0000-0001-7990-3365, Akdeniz University), Özge Erol Doğan (0000-0001-9007-7877, Ardahan University, corresponding author), Fatma Ayvat (0000-0001-5692-4497, Hacettepe University), Ender Ayvat (0000-0002-7111-6495, Hacettepe University)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1702843-1702843
Publication date2025-12-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1702843
PMID41426700
OpenAlexW4417018131
LanguageEN
References cited32

Introduction Frailty is prevalent among older adults and is a growing public health concern. Physical activity questionnaires are pragmatic tools for screening; however, their discriminative capacity remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the discriminative performance and optimal cut-offs of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) for identifying frailty states (non-frail, pre-frail, and frail) in a clinically derived cohort of older adults. Methods The study enrolled 289 older adults who were assessed using a demographic form, the FRAIL Scale, the IPAQ-SF, and the PASE. Frailty discrimination was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC); optimal thresholds were identified using the Youden index, diagnostic indices (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive values) were computed, micro-/macro- area under the curves (AUC) were reported, and scale AUCs were compared using the DeLong test. Results Participants had a mean age of 72.5 ± 7.0 years, and 56.7% were women. Frailty prevalence was 31.1% non-frail, 29.4% pre-frail, and 39.4% frail. For IPAQ-SF, AUCs were 0.45 (non-frail), 0.40 (pre-frail), and 0.67 (frail); for PASE, AUCs were 0.39 (non-frail), 0.50 (pre-frail), and 0.65 (frail). Macro−/micro-AUCs were 0.51/0.53 for IPAQ-SF and 0.51/0.52 for PASE. No significant differences were found between the two instruments across the frailty categories (DeLong test, p > 0.05). At optimal cut-offs (IPAQ-SF ≤ 322.5; PASE ≤ 63.6), both questionnaires showed moderate agreement with the FRAIL Scale ( κ = 0.46–0.48), whereas agreement between the instruments was only low-to-moderate ( κ = 0.32, McNemar p = 0.015). Conclusion IPAQ-SF and PASE demonstrated limited ability to discriminate frailty status in older adults, with moderate accuracy in identifying frail individuals and poor discrimination between the non-frail and pre-frail groups. The IPAQ-SF showed slightly higher specificity, whereas the PASE demonstrated higher sensitivity, indicating that they capture distinct aspects of physical activity behavior but cannot be used interchangeably

Activities of daily living · Discriminative model · MEDLINE · Physical activity · Frailty in Older Adults · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Physical Activity and Health