Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cognitive sovereignty and decolonial public health

Reclaiming epistemic authority in the global AI era

Bibliographic Data

ID22078413
AuthorsSamuel Kakraba (0000-0002-6362-5126, Tulane University), Edmund Fosu Agyemang (0000-0001-8124-4493, Tulane University), Sudesh K Srivastav (Tulane University)
Year2026
Volume14
Pages1785170-1785170
Publication date2026-03-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1785170
PMID41971282
OpenAlexW7140882029
LanguageEN
References cited40

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes critical infrastructure for global health, it reproduces colonial patterns of extraction, mining data from the Global South to train models owned by the Global North. While international bodies like the WHO emphasize “ethical AI,” they often overlook the structural violence of this digital colonialism. This perspective argues that true health equity requires more than bias mitigation; it demands cognitive sovereignty: the right of communities to govern not just their data but also the epistemic logic, interpretive frameworks, and algorithmic reasoning of the systems that analyze it. Drawing from Indigenous data governance principles (OCAP/CARE) and concrete implementation cases from Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Latin America, we demonstrate how cognitive sovereignty extends beyond data sovereignty to encompass control over knowledge production itself. By anchoring this political vision in specific technical architectures, federated learning, and community-led surveillance, we can move from extractive “AI for good” to a decolonial future of autonomous health intelligence. Recent cases from Kenya's AI health deployments and pathogen genomics illustrate both the urgency and feasibility of this transformation

Big data · Cognition · Corporate governance · Global governance · Indigenous · Politics · Sovereignty · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Global Health and Surgery · Global Security and Public Health

  • The Brazilian health system

    Open Access•Jairnilson Silva Paim, Jairnilson Paim et al.•The Lancet•2011

  • Power to the People

    Martina Björkman, J Svensson•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2009

  • Global health security

    Open Access•David L Heymann, Lincoln Chen et al.•The Lancet•2015

  • Operationalizing the Care and Fair Principles for Indigenous data futures

    Open Access•Stephanie R Carroll, Edit Herczog et al.•Scientific Data•2021

  • The Care Principles for Indigenous Data Governance

    Open Access•Stephanie R Carroll, Ibrahim Garba et al.•Data Science Journal•2020

  • Years of Decoloniality

    Open Access•Justine Mcgovern, Lisa Fusco•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Rewriting the byline

    Open Access•Animesh Ghimire•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Epistemic disobedience–Undoing coloniality in global health research

    Open Access•Thirusha Naidu, Seye Abimbola•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

  • Facilitators and barriers to community-led monitoring of health programs

    Open Access•Alana R Sharp, Ngqabutho Mpofu et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

  • Data sovereignty

    Open Access•Patrik Hummel, Matthias Braun et al.•Big Data & Society•2021

  • Overcoming Public Health “Surveillance”

    William J Kassler, Courtney L Bowman•American Journal of Public Health•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae